Laura Prosko is a Squamish councillor, elected on October 17, 2026 with 3,828 votes, 3rd of 15 council candidates, for a term to 2030. Background: Executive Director of the Central Lonsdale Business Improvement Association (North Vancouver), with more than 15 years of senior leadership experience in Indigenous and stakeholder relations on three major B.C. projects (Enbridge, Woodfibre LNG, Massey Tunnel replacement) representing about $27 billion in investment.
- Takes office
- November 3, 2026, at the inaugural council meeting
- Pay
- $46,926 a year (each councillor’s pay in 2025, before expenses and benefits) [District of Squamish]
- Record
- 10 campaign promises tracked · 0 council votes so far
Laura’s roles on council
Not appointed yet. Council usually decides who serves as acting mayor, who sits on the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District board, and who joins which committees at or soon after the swearing in on November 3, 2026. We’ll list Laura’s roles here once the District publishes them.
How council works: no one on council, not even the mayor, decides alone.
Laura’s record on council
Council hasn’t voted yet. We’re tracking 10 promises and 45 positions Laura took during the campaign. First meeting: November 3, 2026.
Laura’s promises 10
What Laura promised during the campaign, in plain words. Tap one for the exact quote and source.
Not tested yetGet simple permit applications decided in under 8 weeks, with published timelines.Who decides: District staff, with targets set by council
What Laura said:
“Streamline red tape so straightforward permit applications get a decision in under 8 weeks, with clear, published timelines businesses can count on.”[source]
Laura’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she moves, seconds or votes for published permit timelines or an 8 week target for simple permits. Not kept if she votes against them.
Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether the District publishes timelines and decides simple permits within 8 weeks. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Laura: council decides as a group.
Who decides: District staff, with targets set by council
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetFinish a Tourism Master Plan in council's first year.
What Laura said:
“Deliver a comprehensive Tourism Master Plan in year one of the next Council term to support a sustainable tourism economy under our "Hardwired for Adventure" brand.”[source]
Laura’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she moves, seconds or votes to fund and adopt a Tourism Master Plan in council's first year. Not kept if she votes against it.
Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether council adopts a Tourism Master Plan by about November 2027. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Laura: council decides as a group.
Who decides: Council
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetGet a stronger 10 year money deal and a 40 year agreement with Woodfibre LNG.Who decides: Woodfibre LNG and council
What Laura said:
“I would like to see a more robust 10-year agreement. I would also pursue a thoughtful long-term MOU covering the 40-year operations period”[source]
Laura’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she moves, seconds or votes to reopen talks for a 10 year tax agreement and a longer agreement with Woodfibre LNG. Not kept if she votes against reopening talks.
Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether the District and Woodfibre LNG sign new agreements. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Laura: council decides as a group.
Who decides: Woodfibre LNG and council
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetCreate a District job, held by a Squamish Nation member, to link the District and the Nation on Woodfibre LNG.Who decides: Council and the Squamish Nation
What Laura said:
“Create a new District of Squamish liaison role, held by a Squamish Nation member, to serve as a conduit between the District and the Squamish Nation on Woodfibre LNG matters including regulation, local content and procurement.”[source]
Laura’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she moves, seconds or votes to create and fund this liaison job. Not kept if she votes against it.
Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether the District creates and fills the job. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Laura: council decides as a group.
Who decides: Council and the Squamish Nation
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetCreate and carry out a Squamish poverty reduction and affordability plan.
What Laura said:
“Develop and implement a Squamish Poverty Reduction and Affordability Strategy.”[source]
Laura’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she moves, seconds or votes to adopt and fund a Poverty Reduction and Affordability Strategy. Not kept if she votes against it.
Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether council adopts and funds one. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Laura: council decides as a group.
Who decides: Council
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetVote no on letting new buildings have less parking than the rules require.
What Laura said:
“I would vote no to parking variances.”[source]
Laura’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she votes against each request to cut required parking. Not kept if she votes for one. We show the count, for example 4 of 5.
Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching how many parking variances council approves. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Laura: council decides as a group.
Who decides: Council
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetWork to start building a second ice rink at Brennan Park in 2027.
What Laura said:
“On Council, I would work toward shovels in the ground in 2027 for a second rink.”[source]
Laura’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she votes for the funding and approvals for a second ice rink at Brennan Park. Not kept if she votes against them.
Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether construction on a second rink starts in 2027. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Laura: council decides as a group.
Who decides: Council
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetHold property taxes flat in 2027 and 2028, and win council votes to do it.
What Laura said:
“Deliver a property tax freeze for 2027 and 2028, and build the council support needed to get it done.”[source]
Laura’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she moves or votes for 0% budgets in 2027 and 2028, and votes against budgets that raise the District's property tax. Not kept if she votes for a budget with an increase.
Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching the property tax increase in the 2027 and 2028 budgets council adopts, as the District reports it. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Laura: council decides as a group.
Who decides: Council
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetPublish an easy online dashboard of big project budgets and timelines.Who decides: Council and District staff
What Laura said:
“Publish a public, plain-language dashboard tracking capital project budgets and timelines, keeping residents informed and Council accountable.”[source]
Laura’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she moves, seconds or votes for a public dashboard of capital project budgets and timelines. Not kept if she votes against it.
Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether the District publishes one. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Laura: council decides as a group.
Who decides: Council and District staff
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetHold a yearly budget town hall, in person and online, before budget decisions.
What Laura said:
“Host an annual Budget Town Hall, both in person and online, where the Mayor and Council present and explain the District's budget, increase transparency, answer residents' questions, and provide an opportunity for meaningful public input before budget decisions are made.”[source]
Laura’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she moves, seconds or votes to hold a yearly budget town hall, in person and online, before budget decisions. Not kept if she votes against it.
Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether council holds one each year. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Laura: council decides as a group.
Who decides: Council
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Do Laura’s votes match what they said in the campaign?
45 things Laura said during the campaign. Each gets a mark once a council vote tests it.
See all 45 positions
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Squamish is growing too fast. Council should slow the pace of new development approvals.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly disagreed: “Taller buildings (above 6 storeys) should be allowed downtown and near transit and services.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly disagreed: “Squamish should open new land and new neighbourhoods for housing, rather than adding density to existing ones.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Squamish should fund more RCMP officers and policing.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly disagreed: “The District should sign the proposed 10-year tax agreement with Woodfibre LNG.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Climate action should be a top council priority, even when it adds cost.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “The District should cut red tape and speed up permits for builders and businesses.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Regional transit to Vancouver and Whistler is worth spending local tax dollars on.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “New buildings should have to provide enough parking for the people who live there, instead of being approved with less.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Spending on inclusion and community symbols (such as rainbow crosswalks, flags and proclamations) is a good use of District money.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Large new developments should be required to include a fixed share of below-market homes, even if that means fewer homes get built.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Height and density should follow clear rules set in advance, rather than being negotiated project by project.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetDisagreed: “Short-term rentals like Airbnb should be restricted further in Squamish.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “The District should fund mental-health and outreach crisis response teams alongside the RCMP.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetDisagreed: “Capital projects above a set cost should go to a public referendum before council approves them.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly disagreed: “The District should borrow to renew Brennan Park now rather than wait until it can be paid for from savings.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly disagreed: “Paid parking downtown is a fair way to manage demand for spaces.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Downtown Squamish needs more public parking, and the District should get it built.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetAgreed: “If Squamish brings in paid parking, residents should park free and only visitors should pay.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “The District should spend local money on protected bike lanes and sidewalks.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “The District should formalize shared decision-making with the Squamish Nation on land use.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “The District should actively work to expand subsidized childcare spaces.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “When public safety downtown and services for homeless people pull in different directions, safety should come first.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “The District should use bylaws to stop open drug use in parks, sidewalks and other public spaces.”
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: A property tax freeze for 2027 and 2028, funded by budget efficiencies, senior-government grants and public-private partnerships
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: Fast-tracking permits and zoning for rental, workforce and missing-middle housing; a Workforce Housing Strategy
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: Investing in basics that haven't kept pace with growth: roads, sidewalks, water and sewer, street lighting and parks
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: A thorough Official Community Plan review and stronger emergency and flood preparedness
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: Expanding Brennan Park (pool and ice rink) as an urgent priority in year one
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: A 10-year financial agreement and a 40-year MOU with Woodfibre LNG, plus legacy projects from WLNG and FortisBC (she worked on the Woodfibre LNG project from 2020 to May 2025)
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: A new District liaison role, held by a Squamish Nation member, on Woodfibre LNG regulation, local content and procurement
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: Permit decisions in under 8 weeks for straightforward applications, and a small-business liaison at the District
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: A Tourism Master Plan in year one of the next council term
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: More downtown parking, for example along Loggers Lane
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: Protecting and expanding public access to the waterfront
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: Pressing Vancouver Coastal Health and the Regional Hospital District for a firm timeline on a new long-term care facility, and for more hospice and acute-care capacity at Squamish General Hospital
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: A Squamish Poverty Reduction and Affordability Strategy
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: Supporting RCMP, fire rescue, emergency services and stronger mental health supports
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: Half-price dog tags every January
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they support: A public capital-projects dashboard, an annual Budget Town Hall, a Multiculturalism Advisory Committee and quarterly "Coffee with Your Councillor" sessions
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they’re against: Parking variances for development applications
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they’re against: Finalizing the current District-Woodfibre LNG tax/community contribution agreement before the election; wants it reviewed 'with fresh perspectives'
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they’re against: The province shifting further tax burden onto local small businesses
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they’re against: Polarization in local decision-making over industry vs. environment
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
Not tested yetSaid they’re against: Aspects of the perpetually affordable housing policy that could cost people their housing if they stop working in town (wants it reviewed)
Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.
What Laura said during the 2026 campaign
Summarised by us from Laura’s own statement. Tap [source] on any line to check it yourself.
Said they support
- A property tax freeze for 2027 and 2028, funded by budget efficiencies, senior-government grants and public-private partnerships
- Fast-tracking permits and zoning for rental, workforce and missing-middle housing; a Workforce Housing Strategy
- Investing in basics that haven't kept pace with growth: roads, sidewalks, water and sewer, street lighting and parks
Show 13 more
- A thorough review and stronger emergency and flood preparedness
- Expanding Brennan Park (pool and ice rink) as an urgent priority in year one
- A 10-year financial agreement and a 40-year MOU with Woodfibre LNG, plus legacy projects from WLNG and FortisBC (she worked on the Woodfibre LNG project from 2020 to May 2025)
- A new District liaison role, held by a Squamish Nation member, on Woodfibre LNG regulation, local content and procurement
- Permit decisions in under 8 weeks for straightforward applications, and a small-business liaison at the District
- A Tourism Master Plan in year one of the next council term
- More downtown parking, for example along Loggers Lane [source]
- Protecting and expanding public access to the waterfront
- Pressing Vancouver Coastal Health and the Regional Hospital District for a firm timeline on a new long-term care facility, and for more hospice and acute-care capacity at Squamish General Hospital
- A Squamish Poverty Reduction and Affordability Strategy
- Supporting RCMP, fire rescue, emergency services and stronger mental health supports
- Half-price dog tags every January
- A public capital-projects dashboard, an annual Budget Town Hall, a Multiculturalism Advisory Committee and quarterly "Coffee with Your Councillor" sessions
Said they’re against
Where Laura said they stand
Each topic opens up: tap it for the detail, quotes and sources.
Growth & developmentGrowing too fast: infrastructure and Brennan Park first; against taller buildings downtown and new neighbourhoods for now✓ Own answers inside
Frames her approach as 'balanced' and 'responsible' growth: fast-track rental, workforce and missing-middle housing while catching up on core infrastructure (roads, sidewalks, water and sewer, street lighting, parks) and leading a thorough review. [source]
“Squamish's future does not depend on choosing one priority over another. It depends on finding the right balance between growth, sustainability, community well-being, and long-term prosperity.”
Some evidence
✓ Direct answer Laura told us:
- Squamish is growing too fast. Council should slow the pace of new development approvals.Strongly agrees
“My Five-Point Plan outlines real solutions for Squamish. We must get back to basics first. Infrastructure must keep pace with growth, fiscal responsibility must guide Council’s decisions, and property owners need real tax relief. It’s time to turn plans into action and deliver results.”
- Taller buildings (above 6 storeys) should be allowed downtown and near transit and services.Strongly disagrees
“We come to Squamish for its natural beauty, outdoor recreation and quality of life, and any decisions about taller buildings must respect the character of our community.”
- Squamish should open new land and new neighbourhoods for housing, rather than adding density to existing ones.Strongly disagrees
“We need to get our infrastructure right before opening new neighbourhoods. Brennan Park is an urgent priority and must be addressed before further growth.”
- Height and density should follow clear rules set in advance, rather than being negotiated project by project.Strongly agrees
“We should have a vision for our community.”
Housing affordabilityBig projects should include below-market homes; “housing security”; keep Airbnb legal and regulated✓ Own answers inside
Would lobby senior governments for funding partnerships for attainable housing, develop a Workforce Housing Strategy, and fast-track permits/zoning for rental, workforce and missing-middle housing. Wants the perpetually affordable housing policy reviewed so people don't lose housing if they stop working in town. [source]
“If circumstances change for someone, what worries me is creating a policy that then maybe circumstances out of their control affect their housing.”
Well documented
✓ Direct answer Laura told us:
- The District should put more public money and land into non-market and housing.In the middle
“The District needs to evolve its Squamish Perpetually Affordable Housing Policy. We need to shift the conversation from housing affordability to housing security, ensuring residents have stable, attainable housing and the confidence that they can remain in our community.”
- Large new developments should be required to include a fixed share of homes, even if that means fewer homes get built.Strongly agrees
- The District should hold on to the land it owns and use it for housing, rather than selling it to fund other things.In the middle
“This needs to be looked at in the review.”
- Short-term rentals like Airbnb should be restricted further in Squamish.Somewhat disagrees
“Squamish is a recreation and tourism community, and many families rely on income from Airbnb rentals. I would rather see these rentals operating legally, within clear municipal regulations, than operating outside the rules and creating additional challenges for our community.”
Homelessness & supportive housingBring everyone to the table; in the middle on shelters, moving Under One Roof and clearing camps✓ Own answers inside
Platform promises a Squamish Poverty Reduction and Affordability Strategy, 'stronger mental health supports' and to 'support vulnerable people in accessing the help and services they need'.
Limited evidence
✓ Direct answer Laura told us:
- Squamish needs more shelter and supportive-housing spaces, even if they are located near residential areas.In the middle
“Our and land-use priorities must address the need for more shelter and while carefully considering locations, neighbourhood impacts and community safety.”
- The shelter and its services should be moved out of downtown.In the middle
“The and land use planning (and vision for our community) has to come first and I believe more community engagement to see what the community and residents would like to see.”
- The District should clear tent from public spaces, even when there is nowhere else for those people to go.In the middle
“I address this in my Five Point Plan.”
- The District should provide a sanctioned place on public land for people living in vehicles.In the middle
“The Tourism Master Plan needs to get completed - it was suppose to be complete in 2025 and it has not and campaign / vehicle usage is addressed in there.”
- When public safety downtown and services for homeless people pull in different directions, safety should come first.Strongly agrees
“We need safety for our residents, guests and our vulnerable population.”
- Supportive and low-income housing should be spread across all neighbourhoods rather than concentrated downtown.In the middle
“This is an and vision for our community question.”
Policing & community safetyStrongly for more RCMP, a mental-health car and bylaws against open drug use✓ Own answers inside
Platform says she will 'prioritize community safety and support RCMP, fire rescue, emergency services and stronger mental health supports'.
“Prioritize community safety and support RCMP, fire rescue, emergency services and stronger mental health supports.”
Some evidence
✓ Direct answer Laura told us:
- Squamish should fund more RCMP officers and policing.Strongly agrees
“Yes, including a mental health car and a local community policing office in the downtown area.”
- The District should put more bylaw enforcement officers downtown.In the middle
- The District should fund mental-health and outreach crisis response teams alongside the RCMP.Strongly agrees
“Yes, we need the mental health car in Squamish. It's a fantastic program.”
- The District should use bylaws to stop open drug use in parks, sidewalks and other public spaces.Strongly agrees
“I support safe, accessible parks, sidewalks and public spaces for everyone. Council should use the bylaw and enforcement tools available to it, within provincial law, while working with the RCMP and health authorities to address public drug use and connect people with appropriate supports. B.C.’s decriminalization pilot ended on January 31, 2026. Possession of illicit drugs is again illegal outside exempted locations, so the District does not need to rely solely on new bylaws to address this issue. Education on this issue is also a must.”
Taxes & spendingTwo-year tax freeze without cutting services; against borrowing for Brennan Park now; against the Woodfibre deal✓ Own answers inside
Calls for a property tax freeze in 2027 and 2028, focusing spending on core services and balanced budgets, with infrastructure paid for through efficiencies, senior-government grants and public-private partnerships. Still wants Brennan Park expansion treated as urgent. Promises a capital-projects dashboard and annual Budget Town Hall. [source]
“We also need to seriously look at different levels of government and what they can bring to the table through grants and partnerships, and then also public-private partnerships.”
Well documented
✓ Direct answer Laura told us:
- Keeping property tax increases at or below inflation should be a top priority, even if it means cutting services or delaying projects.In the middle
“I believe property owners need real tax relief. My proposal is a two-year municipal property tax freeze for 2027 and 2028, supported by responsible spending, new revenue opportunities but not cutting municipal projects and services.”
- The District should sign the proposed 10-year tax agreement with Woodfibre LNG.Strongly disagrees
“I proposed a different deal in my Five Point Plan.”
- Major recreation investments, like renewing Brennan Park, should go ahead even if the District has to borrow.In the middle
“I think Brennan Park should go ahead and we won't have to borrow if we are fiscally responsible.”
- Capital projects above a set cost should go to a public referendum before council approves them.Somewhat disagrees
“Council should have their budget managed well so we are fiscally responsible and not above budgets.”
- The District should borrow to renew Brennan Park now rather than wait until it can be paid for from savings.Strongly disagrees
“No, we should find the budget efficiences and start in 2027.”
Climate & environmentClimate action a top priority✓ Own answers inside
Pledges stronger emergency and flood preparedness. We found no specific climate action position in her public statements before she answered our questionnaire; her own answers are below. [source]
Limited evidence
✓ Direct answer Laura told us:
- Climate action should be a top council priority, even when it adds cost.Strongly agrees
“Climate action is a top priority.”
- New buildings should have to meet higher energy standards, even if that raises the cost of building.In the middle
“This is also for a discussion in the review and for a vision in the community.”
Woodfibre LNG plantWants the Woodfibre deal renegotiated for more money✓ Own answers inside
A former Woodfibre LNG stakeholder/Indigenous/government relations lead (2020-May 2025). Wants a stronger 10-year financial agreement, a 40-year operations-long MOU, legacy projects, a Squamish Nation-held liaison role, and says the current tax/community contribution agreement should wait until after the election. Says economic growth and environmental stewardship 'must go hand in hand' with 'strong environmental oversight and accountability'. [source]
“I believe it needs to be reviewed with fresh perspectives, and we need to hold off and make sure that we have the best deal for Squamish.”
Well documented
✓ Direct answer Laura told us:
- The District should use its permit powers to press Woodfibre LNG on local impacts, even if that means delays or legal fights.Didn’t pick an answer
“The question does not make sense without addressing Council’s relationship with Woodfibre LNG and the need to renegotiate an agreement that delivers greater long-term financial benefits to Squamish.”
Transportation & transitStrongly for regional transit, bike lanes and sidewalks; “but we need fiscal responsibility”✓ Own answers inside
Calls active transportation 'fantastic' but says some residents need vehicles and street parking; suggests enhanced parking along Loggers Lane and opposes parking for developments. Platform also pledges to improve Sea to Sky corridor transit connectivity, accessibility, pedestrian safety and e-bike safety. [source]
“I believe there are some ways in downtown Squamish that we can use land planning differently, like, for example, along Loggers Lane, for enhanced parking, and we need to get back to those basics first and foremost.”
Well documented
✓ Direct answer Laura told us:
- Regional transit to Vancouver and Whistler is worth spending local tax dollars on.Strongly agrees
“Regional Transit provides security and safety. We also need to look at access to the rail - like they do in Europe.”
- The District should spend local money on protected bike lanes and sidewalks.Strongly agrees
“Active transportation is essential but we need fiscal responsibility.”
ParkingMore public parking downtown; would vote no on parking variances; against paid parking✓ Own answers inside
Her platform tagline includes 'Increase downtown parking' and her priorities page pledges to 'Improve downtown transportation, pedestrian safety, accessibility and parking.' She told the Chief active transportation is 'fantastic' but some residents need vehicles and street parking, and suggested using land along Loggers Lane for 'enhanced parking'. The Chief reports she 'is not in favour of parking for development applications'. [source]
“I believe there are some ways in downtown Squamish that we can use land planning differently, like, for example, along Loggers Lane, for enhanced parking, and we need to get back to those basics first and foremost.”
Well documented
✓ Direct answer Laura told us:
- New buildings should have to provide enough parking for the people who live there, instead of being approved with less.Strongly agrees
“I would vote no to parking .”
- Paid parking downtown is a fair way to manage demand for spaces.Strongly disagrees
- Downtown Squamish needs more public parking, and the District should get it built.Strongly agrees
- If Squamish brings in paid parking, residents should park free and only visitors should pay.Somewhat agrees
Jobs & local economyStrongly for cutting red tape for small business✓ Own answers inside
Wants sub-8-week permit decisions, a small-business liaison, investment attraction in tech, film, outdoor recreation and port/rail, a Tourism Master Plan in year one, and local-content opportunities from Woodfibre LNG for Squamish businesses and workers.
Well documented
✓ Direct answer Laura told us:
- The District should cut red tape and speed up permits for builders and businesses.Strongly agrees
“Red tape hinders a strong local economy for small businesses.”
- Land set aside for industry and jobs should be protected from being rezoned for housing.In the middle
“This is an and vision and land use planning scenario and as I have said in my Five Point Plan, you need a strong local economy so we need a balance first.”
Compare everyone on: growth and development · housing · homelessness and supportive housing · policing and community safety · property taxes and spending · climate and the environment · the Woodfibre LNG plant · transit and Highway 99 · parking · jobs and the local economy.
Laura’s own priority list
- Housing, Affordability, Growth and Infrastructure
- Support for Small Business and Local Economy
- Woodfibre LNG and Fortis BC Partnerships
- Safe, Healthy and Connected Communities
- Good Governance and Your Tax Dollars
In Laura’s own words ✓ Direct
If you achieve only one thing in four years, what is it?
Deliver responsible growth by ensuring Squamish has the infrastructure to support it. That means making Brennan Park’s pool and rink expansion a reality, investing in our roads and essential services, and ensuring growth pays its fair share rather than placing a burden on property taxpayers.
Name something you will vote against, even if it is popular.
Parking .
Squamish’s sharpest argument: what would you actually do about encampments, Under One Roof and street disorder, and what would it cost?
Throughout my career, I have delivered results by bringing people together, tackling difficult issues and finding practical solutions. I am disappointed that there has not been more thoughtful engagement in our community on , 's need and realities and public safety for all. I would bring residents, businesses, service providers, stakeholders, the nation, the RCMP and health authorities to the table. We need an informed community, meaningful support for vulnerable people and safe streets, parks and neighbourhoods for everyone. I would review existing spending, identify service gaps and pursue provincial / federal funding before committing additional municipal dollars. This issue requires leadership, diplomacy and the courage to have difficult conversations. I bring that experience, and I am prepared to lead those conversations and turn them into action.
One council decision from the last four years you’d have made differently, and what you’d have done.
The Woodfibre LNG agreement.
What would you say to a resident on the other side of your biggest issue?
Lets sit down and have a thoughtful conversation on how we can work together.
Your one line pitch
I will bring strong leadership to the Council table, be an active presence in our community and deliver real results for Squamish.
Laura explains their answers ✓ Direct
Laura added a comment to 32 of the statements we put to every candidate. These are Laura’s words, unedited.
- Squamish is growing too fast. Council should slow the pace of new development approvals.Strongly agrees
“My Five-Point Plan outlines real solutions for Squamish. We must get back to basics first. Infrastructure must keep pace with growth, fiscal responsibility must guide Council’s decisions, and property owners need real tax relief. It’s time to turn plans into action and deliver results.”
- Taller buildings (above 6 storeys) should be allowed downtown and near transit and services.Strongly disagrees
“We come to Squamish for its natural beauty, outdoor recreation and quality of life, and any decisions about taller buildings must respect the character of our community.”
- Squamish should open new land and new neighbourhoods for housing, rather than adding density to existing ones.Strongly disagrees
“We need to get our infrastructure right before opening new neighbourhoods. Brennan Park is an urgent priority and must be addressed before further growth.”
- The District should put more public money and land into non-market and housing.In the middle
“The District needs to evolve its Squamish Perpetually Affordable Housing Policy. We need to shift the conversation from housing affordability to housing security, ensuring residents have stable, attainable housing and the confidence that they can remain in our community.”
Show 28 more
- Squamish needs more shelter and supportive-housing spaces, even if they are located near residential areas.In the middle
“Our and land-use priorities must address the need for more shelter and while carefully considering locations, neighbourhood impacts and community safety.”
- Squamish should fund more RCMP officers and policing.Strongly agrees
“Yes, including a mental health car and a local community policing office in the downtown area.”
- Keeping property tax increases at or below inflation should be a top priority, even if it means cutting services or delaying projects.In the middle
“I believe property owners need real tax relief. My proposal is a two-year municipal property tax freeze for 2027 and 2028, supported by responsible spending, new revenue opportunities but not cutting municipal projects and services.”
- The District should sign the proposed 10-year tax agreement with Woodfibre LNG.Strongly disagrees
“I proposed a different deal in my Five Point Plan.”
- The District should use its permit powers to press Woodfibre LNG on local impacts, even if that means delays or legal fights.Didn’t pick an answer
“The question does not make sense without addressing Council’s relationship with Woodfibre LNG and the need to renegotiate an agreement that delivers greater long-term financial benefits to Squamish.”
- Climate action should be a top council priority, even when it adds cost.Strongly agrees
“Climate action is a top priority.”
- The District should cut red tape and speed up permits for builders and businesses.Strongly agrees
“Red tape hinders a strong local economy for small businesses.”
- Regional transit to Vancouver and Whistler is worth spending local tax dollars on.Strongly agrees
“Regional Transit provides security and safety. We also need to look at access to the rail - like they do in Europe.”
- New buildings should have to provide enough parking for the people who live there, instead of being approved with less.Strongly agrees
“I would vote no to parking .”
- Major recreation investments, like renewing Brennan Park, should go ahead even if the District has to borrow.In the middle
“I think Brennan Park should go ahead and we won't have to borrow if we are fiscally responsible.”
- The shelter and its services should be moved out of downtown.In the middle
“The and land use planning (and vision for our community) has to come first and I believe more community engagement to see what the community and residents would like to see.”
- The District should clear tent from public spaces, even when there is nowhere else for those people to go.In the middle
“I address this in my Five Point Plan.”
- Spending on inclusion and community symbols (such as rainbow crosswalks, flags and proclamations) is a good use of District money.Strongly agrees
“Absolutely, it provides and showcases an inclusive community.”
- Height and density should follow clear rules set in advance, rather than being negotiated project by project.Strongly agrees
“We should have a vision for our community.”
- The District should hold on to the land it owns and use it for housing, rather than selling it to fund other things.In the middle
“This needs to be looked at in the review.”
- Short-term rentals like Airbnb should be restricted further in Squamish.Somewhat disagrees
“Squamish is a recreation and tourism community, and many families rely on income from Airbnb rentals. I would rather see these rentals operating legally, within clear municipal regulations, than operating outside the rules and creating additional challenges for our community.”
- The District should provide a sanctioned place on public land for people living in vehicles.In the middle
“The Tourism Master Plan needs to get completed - it was suppose to be complete in 2025 and it has not and campaign / vehicle usage is addressed in there.”
- The District should fund mental-health and outreach crisis response teams alongside the RCMP.Strongly agrees
“Yes, we need the mental health car in Squamish. It's a fantastic program.”
- Capital projects above a set cost should go to a public referendum before council approves them.Somewhat disagrees
“Council should have their budget managed well so we are fiscally responsible and not above budgets.”
- The District should borrow to renew Brennan Park now rather than wait until it can be paid for from savings.Strongly disagrees
“No, we should find the budget efficiences and start in 2027.”
- New buildings should have to meet higher energy standards, even if that raises the cost of building.In the middle
“This is also for a discussion in the review and for a vision in the community.”
- The District should spend local money on protected bike lanes and sidewalks.Strongly agrees
“Active transportation is essential but we need fiscal responsibility.”
- Land set aside for industry and jobs should be protected from being rezoned for housing.In the middle
“This is an and vision and land use planning scenario and as I have said in my Five Point Plan, you need a strong local economy so we need a balance first.”
- The District should increase spending on dikes and flood protection, even if it means higher taxes.In the middle
“I do not advocate for hiring taxes - as I outline in my Five Point Plan but I am for flood protection. (and emergency preparedness)”
- The District should actively work to expand subsidized childcare spaces.Strongly agrees
“This needs to be a part of our community connection and vision for Squamish.”
- When public safety downtown and services for homeless people pull in different directions, safety should come first.Strongly agrees
“We need safety for our residents, guests and our vulnerable population.”
- Supportive and low-income housing should be spread across all neighbourhoods rather than concentrated downtown.In the middle
“This is an and vision for our community question.”
- The District should use bylaws to stop open drug use in parks, sidewalks and other public spaces.Strongly agrees
“I support safe, accessible parks, sidewalks and public spaces for everyone. Council should use the bylaw and enforcement tools available to it, within provincial law, while working with the RCMP and health authorities to address public drug use and connect people with appropriate supports. B.C.’s decriminalization pilot ended on January 31, 2026. Possession of illicit drugs is again illegal outside exempted locations, so the District does not need to rely solely on new bylaws to address this issue. Education on this issue is also a must.”
Laura answered all 38 statements we put to every candidate. The answers with comments are above. Tap below for the full list.
All 38 of Laura’s questionnaire answers ✓ Direct
- Squamish is growing too fast. Council should slow the pace of new development approvals.Strongly agrees
“My Five-Point Plan outlines real solutions for Squamish. We must get back to basics first. Infrastructure must keep pace with growth, fiscal responsibility must guide Council’s decisions, and property owners need real tax relief. It’s time to turn plans into action and deliver results.”
- Taller buildings (above 6 storeys) should be allowed downtown and near transit and services.Strongly disagrees
“We come to Squamish for its natural beauty, outdoor recreation and quality of life, and any decisions about taller buildings must respect the character of our community.”
- Squamish should open new land and new neighbourhoods for housing, rather than adding density to existing ones.Strongly disagrees
“We need to get our infrastructure right before opening new neighbourhoods. Brennan Park is an urgent priority and must be addressed before further growth.”
- The District should put more public money and land into non-market and housing.In the middle
“The District needs to evolve its Squamish Perpetually Affordable Housing Policy. We need to shift the conversation from housing affordability to housing security, ensuring residents have stable, attainable housing and the confidence that they can remain in our community.”
- Squamish needs more shelter and supportive-housing spaces, even if they are located near residential areas.In the middle
“Our and land-use priorities must address the need for more shelter and while carefully considering locations, neighbourhood impacts and community safety.”
- Squamish should fund more RCMP officers and policing.Strongly agrees
“Yes, including a mental health car and a local community policing office in the downtown area.”
- Keeping property tax increases at or below inflation should be a top priority, even if it means cutting services or delaying projects.In the middle
“I believe property owners need real tax relief. My proposal is a two-year municipal property tax freeze for 2027 and 2028, supported by responsible spending, new revenue opportunities but not cutting municipal projects and services.”
- The District should sign the proposed 10-year tax agreement with Woodfibre LNG.Strongly disagrees
“I proposed a different deal in my Five Point Plan.”
- The District should use its permit powers to press Woodfibre LNG on local impacts, even if that means delays or legal fights.Didn’t pick an answer
“The question does not make sense without addressing Council’s relationship with Woodfibre LNG and the need to renegotiate an agreement that delivers greater long-term financial benefits to Squamish.”
- Climate action should be a top council priority, even when it adds cost.Strongly agrees
“Climate action is a top priority.”
- The District should cut red tape and speed up permits for builders and businesses.Strongly agrees
“Red tape hinders a strong local economy for small businesses.”
- Regional transit to Vancouver and Whistler is worth spending local tax dollars on.Strongly agrees
“Regional Transit provides security and safety. We also need to look at access to the rail - like they do in Europe.”
- New buildings should have to provide enough parking for the people who live there, instead of being approved with less.Strongly agrees
“I would vote no to parking .”
- Major recreation investments, like renewing Brennan Park, should go ahead even if the District has to borrow.In the middle
“I think Brennan Park should go ahead and we won't have to borrow if we are fiscally responsible.”
- The shelter and its services should be moved out of downtown.In the middle
“The and land use planning (and vision for our community) has to come first and I believe more community engagement to see what the community and residents would like to see.”
- The District should clear tent from public spaces, even when there is nowhere else for those people to go.In the middle
“I address this in my Five Point Plan.”
- Spending on inclusion and community symbols (such as rainbow crosswalks, flags and proclamations) is a good use of District money.Strongly agrees
“Absolutely, it provides and showcases an inclusive community.”
- Large new developments should be required to include a fixed share of homes, even if that means fewer homes get built.Strongly agrees
- Height and density should follow clear rules set in advance, rather than being negotiated project by project.Strongly agrees
“We should have a vision for our community.”
- The District should hold on to the land it owns and use it for housing, rather than selling it to fund other things.In the middle
“This needs to be looked at in the review.”
- Short-term rentals like Airbnb should be restricted further in Squamish.Somewhat disagrees
“Squamish is a recreation and tourism community, and many families rely on income from Airbnb rentals. I would rather see these rentals operating legally, within clear municipal regulations, than operating outside the rules and creating additional challenges for our community.”
- The District should provide a sanctioned place on public land for people living in vehicles.In the middle
“The Tourism Master Plan needs to get completed - it was suppose to be complete in 2025 and it has not and campaign / vehicle usage is addressed in there.”
- The District should put more bylaw enforcement officers downtown.In the middle
- The District should fund mental-health and outreach crisis response teams alongside the RCMP.Strongly agrees
“Yes, we need the mental health car in Squamish. It's a fantastic program.”
- Capital projects above a set cost should go to a public referendum before council approves them.Somewhat disagrees
“Council should have their budget managed well so we are fiscally responsible and not above budgets.”
- The District should borrow to renew Brennan Park now rather than wait until it can be paid for from savings.Strongly disagrees
“No, we should find the budget efficiences and start in 2027.”
- New buildings should have to meet higher energy standards, even if that raises the cost of building.In the middle
“This is also for a discussion in the review and for a vision in the community.”
- Paid parking downtown is a fair way to manage demand for spaces.Strongly disagrees
- Downtown Squamish needs more public parking, and the District should get it built.Strongly agrees
- If Squamish brings in paid parking, residents should park free and only visitors should pay.Somewhat agrees
- The District should spend local money on protected bike lanes and sidewalks.Strongly agrees
“Active transportation is essential but we need fiscal responsibility.”
- Land set aside for industry and jobs should be protected from being rezoned for housing.In the middle
“This is an and vision and land use planning scenario and as I have said in my Five Point Plan, you need a strong local economy so we need a balance first.”
- The District should increase spending on dikes and flood protection, even if it means higher taxes.In the middle
“I do not advocate for hiring taxes - as I outline in my Five Point Plan but I am for flood protection. (and emergency preparedness)”
- The District should formalize shared decision-making with the Squamish Nation on land use.Strongly agrees
- The District should actively work to expand subsidized childcare spaces.Strongly agrees
“This needs to be a part of our community connection and vision for Squamish.”
- When public safety downtown and services for homeless people pull in different directions, safety should come first.Strongly agrees
“We need safety for our residents, guests and our vulnerable population.”
- Supportive and low-income housing should be spread across all neighbourhoods rather than concentrated downtown.In the middle
“This is an and vision for our community question.”
- The District should use bylaws to stop open drug use in parks, sidewalks and other public spaces.Strongly agrees
“I support safe, accessible parks, sidewalks and public spaces for everyone. Council should use the bylaw and enforcement tools available to it, within provincial law, while working with the RCMP and health authorities to address public drug use and connect people with appropriate supports. B.C.’s decriminalization pilot ended on January 31, 2026. Possession of illicit drugs is again illegal outside exempted locations, so the District does not need to rely solely on new bylaws to address this issue. Education on this issue is also a must.”
Answered by Laura Prosko on September 24, 2026. Where these differ from our earlier reading of the public record, the candidate’s own answer is what counts in the quiz and compare pages.
Questions about Laura Prosko
- Is Laura Prosko on Squamish council?
Yes. Laura Prosko was elected to Squamish council on October 17, 2026 with 3,828 votes, one of six councillors serving with Mayor Sean Easton until 2030.
- When does Laura Prosko take office?
Laura Prosko is sworn in with the new council at the inaugural meeting on November 3, 2026 at 6 p.m. at Squamish Valley Golf Club, 2458 Mamquam Road.
- What did Laura Prosko promise?
We track 10 promises Laura made during the 2026 campaign, including: Get simple permit applications decided in under 8 weeks, with published timelines; Finish a Tourism Master Plan in council's first year; Get a stronger 10 year money deal and a 40 year agreement with Woodfibre LNG. Each one is marked kept or not kept by how Laura votes, not by what council as a whole decides.
- How has Laura Prosko voted on council?
Council hasn’t voted yet. The first regular meeting is November 17, 2026. Every vote Laura casts will be listed on this page.
- How much is a Squamish councillor paid?
In 2025 the each councillor was paid $46,926, not counting expenses and benefits, according to the District of Squamish financial statement.
About Laura
Executive Director of the Central Lonsdale Business Improvement Association (North Vancouver), with more than 15 years of senior leadership experience in Indigenous and stakeholder relations on three major B.C. projects (Enbridge, Woodfibre LNG, Massey Tunnel replacement) representing about $27 billion in investment. She says she was recruited to move to Squamish in 2020 to work on Woodfibre LNG (until May 2025). Serves on the Westwinds Seniors Board and the International Cultural Heritage Society, previously served with the Squamish Chamber of Commerce, has been involved with Rotary, and is trained as an Emergency Support Services Officer and Information Officer.
Where Laura leans on money, growth and LNG
Worked out from Laura’s public statements and votes, not a label they chose. See everyone side by side · Who on council thinks like you? Take the quiz.
Sources we used (6)
- Laura Prosko campaign site - Five Point Plan
- Laura Prosko campaign site - Meet Laura
- Squamish Chief (Sept 17 2026): Laura Prosko touts industry ties, pitches property tax freeze
- The Squamish Reporter (Sept 8 2026): Laura Prosko announces council bid, outlines five-point plan
- Squamish Chief letter (June 17 2026): 'Long history of industry and innovation'
- District of Squamish official candidate list
Hear it from Laura directly
Are you Laura Prosko, or did you spot a mistake? Email squamishvoters@gmail.com to update or add to this page. How corrections work.
Get it by email, once a week
Every Friday morning: what council decided that week and what’s coming up. Plain words, nothing else. Unsubscribe any time.
Sent by Squamish Voters (Jeff Kirdeikis, Squamish, B.C.). We never share your address. See this week’s email.