← The whole council

Sean Easton is the Mayor of Squamish, elected on October 17, 2026 with 3,681 votes, 175 more than Jenna Stoner, for a term to 2030. Background: Co-Executive Director of Zero Ceiling, a Whistler-based non-profit working to end youth homelessness (he took on leadership in 2017), and co-founder of DWIFT Housing Society, a Squamish non-profit aiming to sell homes at cost.

Takes office
November 3, 2026, at the inaugural council meeting
Pay
$103,946 a year (the mayor’s pay in 2025, before expenses and benefits) [District of Squamish]
Record
11 campaign promises tracked · 0 council votes so far

Sean’s roles on council

Not appointed yet. Council usually decides who serves as acting mayor, who sits on the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District board, and who joins which committees at or soon after the swearing in on November 3, 2026. We’ll list Sean’s roles here once the District publishes them.

How council works: no one on council, not even the mayor, decides alone.

Sean’s record on council

Council hasn’t voted yet. We’re tracking 11 promises and 39 positions Sean took during the campaign. First meeting: November 3, 2026.

Sean’s promises 11

What Sean promised during the campaign, in plain words. Tap one for the exact quote and source.

Not tested yetPut air and water monitoring stations around town to track possible effects from Woodfibre LNG.Who decides: Council and the Province

What Sean said:

“Install extensive air and water monitoring stations throughout the community to track potential impacts in real time”
[source]

Sean’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if he moves, seconds or votes to fund or secure community air and water monitoring stations that report to the public. Not kept if he votes against them.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether monitoring stations are set up and report results. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Sean: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council and the Province

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetPause approval of new developments unless they clearly make life better and more affordable.Who decides: Council, within provincial housing law

What Sean said:

“Pausing approval of new development unless it meaningfully improves quality of life and affordability”
[source]

Sean’s part (the only thing we mark): Counts only rezonings, which council votes on. Kept if he votes against a rezoning whose staff report shows no affordable homes and no community benefits beyond what the rules require. Not kept if he votes for one.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching how many rezonings council approves. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Sean: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council, within provincial housing law

Since Bill 44 (2023), council cannot pause housing that fits existing zoning: those projects need only staff permits. So this can only be tested on rezonings.

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetSpeed up the Pioneer Way supportive housing project.Who decides: BC Housing and council

What Sean said:

“Expedite the Pioneer Way supportive housing project to create more permanent deeply affordable housing for those facing homelessness”
[source]

Sean’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if he moves, seconds or votes for steps that move the Pioneer Way supportive housing forward, such as approvals, land or permits. Not kept if he votes against them.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether it gets built, and when. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Sean: council decides as a group.

Who decides: BC Housing and council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetRaise the share of affordable homes developers must hand over to the District.

What Sean said:

“Increase the proportion of affordable units that developers must provide to the DOS.”
[source]

Sean’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if he moves, seconds or votes for a policy or bylaw that requires a bigger share of affordable homes in new developments. Not kept if he votes against one.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether council adopts one. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Sean: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetSet up formal shared decision making with the Squamish Nation on land use.Who decides: Squamish Nation and council

What Sean said:

“As Mayor, I want to go beyond consultation to genuine, formalized shared decision-making on land use and environmental stewardship”
[source]

Sean’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if he moves, seconds or votes to start talks or sign an agreement with the Squamish Nation on shared decisions about land use or the environment. Not kept if he votes against it.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether both governments sign an agreement. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Sean: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Squamish Nation and council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetPick a location for a downtown parkade.

What Sean said:

“Identifying a location for a parkade.”
[source]

Sean’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if he moves, seconds or votes to choose or reserve a site for a downtown parkade. Not kept if he votes against choosing one.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether council picks a site this term. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Sean: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetStop letting new buildings get approved with less parking than the rules require.

What Sean said:

“Placing a moratorium on parking variances, so developers provide enough parking for their buildings.”
[source]

Sean’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if he moves or votes for a pause on parking variances, or votes against each request to cut required parking. Not kept if he votes for one. We show the count, for example 4 of 5.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching how many parking variances council approves. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Sean: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetNegotiate with Woodfibre LNG for a new recreation centre with a pool and ice rink.Who decides: Woodfibre LNG and council

What Sean said:

“Negotiate with Woodfibre LNG for a new recreation centre with an ice rink and pool”
[source]

Sean’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if he moves, seconds or votes to make a new recreation centre with a pool and ice rink part of talks with Woodfibre LNG. Not kept if he votes against asking for it.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether a new agreement with Woodfibre LNG includes money for a recreation centre. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Sean: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Woodfibre LNG and council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetHold property taxes flat in 2027, with no increase.

What Sean said:

“Freeze property taxes for 2027”
[source]

Sean’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if he moves or votes for a 0% increase in the 2027 budget, and votes against a 2027 budget that raises the District's property tax. Not kept if he votes for a 2027 budget with an increase.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching the 2027 property tax increase council adopts, as the District reports it. If he votes no and loses, his promise is still kept. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Sean: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetPause new bike lane and sidewalk upgrades until residents have been properly consulted.

What Sean said:

“Placing a moratorium on active transportation upgrades until more effective community engagement has taken place.”
[source]

Sean’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if he moves, seconds or votes to pause new bike lane and sidewalk projects until residents are consulted. Not kept if he votes to start a new one before that.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether council pauses them. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Sean: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetWork with BC Transit and the province for an express highway bus every 15 minutes.Who decides: BC Transit and the Province

What Sean said:

“Partnering with BC Transit and the provincial government to establish an express bus down the highway every 15 minutes, making transit a more practical option”
[source]

Sean’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if he moves, seconds or votes for a formal District request to BC Transit and the Province for express highway buses every 15 minutes. Not kept if he votes against it.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether express buses run every 15 minutes. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Sean: council decides as a group.

Who decides: BC Transit and the Province

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Do Sean’s votes match what they said in the campaign?

39 things Sean said during the campaign. Each gets a mark once a council vote tests it.

See all 39 positions
Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Squamish is growing too fast. Council should slow the pace of new development approvals.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetDisagreed: “Squamish should open new land and new neighbourhoods for housing, rather than adding density to existing ones.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “The District should put more public money and land into non-market and below-market housing.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetAgreed: “Squamish needs more shelter and supportive-housing spaces, even if they are located near residential areas.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Keeping property tax increases at or below inflation should be a top priority, even if it means cutting services or delaying projects.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly disagreed: “The District should sign the proposed 10-year tax agreement with Woodfibre LNG.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetAgreed: “The District should use its permit powers to press Woodfibre LNG on local impacts, even if that means delays or legal fights.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetAgreed: “Climate action should be a top council priority, even when it adds cost.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “The District should cut red tape and speed up permits for builders and businesses.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetAgreed: “Regional transit to Vancouver and Whistler is worth spending local tax dollars on.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “New buildings should have to provide enough parking for the people who live there, instead of being approved with less.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetAgreed: “Major recreation investments, like renewing Brennan Park, should go ahead even if the District has to borrow.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly disagreed: “The District should clear tent encampments from public spaces, even when there is nowhere else for those people to go.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Large new developments should be required to include a fixed share of below-market homes, even if that means fewer homes get built.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetDisagreed: “Height and density should follow clear rules set in advance, rather than being negotiated project by project.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “The District should hold on to the land it owns and use it for housing, rather than selling it to fund other things.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “The District should provide a sanctioned place on public land for people living in vehicles.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “The District should fund mental-health and outreach crisis response teams alongside the RCMP.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetAgreed: “Paid parking downtown is a fair way to manage demand for spaces.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Downtown Squamish needs more public parking, and the District should get it built.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “If Squamish brings in paid parking, residents should park free and only visitors should pay.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetDisagreed: “The District should spend local money on protected bike lanes and sidewalks.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “The District should formalize shared decision-making with the Squamish Nation on land use.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetAgreed: “The District should actively work to expand subsidized childcare spaces.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetDisagreed: “When public safety downtown and services for homeless people pull in different directions, safety should come first.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetAgreed: “The District should use bylaws to stop open drug use in parks, sidewalks and other public spaces.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Freezing property taxes for 2027

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Creating housing that locals can afford throughout their lives, including below-market home ownership through non-profit models like DWIFT

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Using public land for non-profit affordable housing: DWIFT submitted an expression of interest to buy part of the District's Pioneer Way land for permanently affordable housing rather than have it sold to a private developer (the Dec. 2 presentation to council urging it to reserve the land was made by Zero Ceiling co-executive director Lizi McLoughlin)

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: New accessible recreation: a splash park, indoor playground and fitness centre (in his WLNG op-ed he says the need he hears most often is a second sheet of ice, updated pool facilities and improved change rooms)

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Committing Woodfibre LNG money to a community-selected legacy capital project

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Environmental monitoring to hold industry accountable

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: 'Resident-centered governance': authentic engagement and measuring success by whether residents' needs are met

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Pushing provincial and federal governments for Squamish's 'fair share' of funding; supporting local businesses

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they’re against: The proposed 10-year Woodfibre LNG agreement as written: says it doesn't guarantee lasting community benefit and the pre-election timing prevents meaningful public participation

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they’re against: Judging housing policy by units approved rather than affordability outcomes: says the District added over 25% to its housing stock while prices and taxes kept climbing

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they’re against: District capital-project cost overruns: says the last two District-managed capital projects went more than $20 million over budget

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they’re against: The 12.8% 2026 property tax increase, which he says has not delivered matching amenities or infrastructure

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they’re against: Leveraging land and resources for 'short-term profit' rather than long-term shared benefit

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

What Sean said during the 2026 campaign

✓ Verified: in Sean’s own words. Sean filled in our candidate questionnaire on September 25, 2026. It was sent from the email address Sean filed with the District of Squamish. Everything marked ✓ Direct answer below is Sean’s own answer, not our reading of the public record. Jump to all answers.

Our summary of what Sean has said and done in public. Tap [source] on any line to check it yourself.

Said they support

  • Freezing property taxes for 2027 [source]
  • Creating housing that locals can afford throughout their lives, including home ownership through non-profit models like DWIFT [source]
  • Using public land for non-profit affordable housing: DWIFT submitted an expression of interest to buy part of the District's Pioneer Way land for permanently affordable housing rather than have it sold to a private developer (the Dec. 2 presentation to council urging it to reserve the land was made by Zero Ceiling co-executive director Lizi McLoughlin) [source]
Show 5 more
  • New accessible recreation: a splash park, indoor playground and fitness centre (in his WLNG op-ed he says the need he hears most often is a second sheet of ice, updated pool facilities and improved change rooms) [source]
  • Committing Woodfibre LNG money to a community-selected legacy capital project [source]
  • Environmental monitoring to hold industry accountable [source]
  • 'Resident-centered governance': authentic engagement and measuring success by whether residents' needs are met [source]
  • Pushing provincial and federal governments for Squamish's 'fair share' of funding; supporting local businesses [source]

Said they’re against

  • The proposed 10-year Woodfibre LNG agreement as written: says it doesn't guarantee lasting community benefit and the pre-election timing prevents meaningful public participation [source]
  • Judging housing policy by units approved rather than affordability outcomes: says the District added over 25% to its housing stock while prices and taxes kept climbing [source]
  • District capital-project cost overruns: says the last two District-managed capital projects went more than $20 million over budget [source]
Show 2 more
  • The 12.8% 2026 property tax increase, which he says has not delivered matching amenities or infrastructure [source]
  • Leveraging land and resources for 'short-term profit' rather than long-term shared benefit [source]

Where Sean said they stand

Each topic opens up: tap it for the detail, quotes and sources.

Growth & developmentGrowing too fast: slow approvals until infrastructure catches up; judge each project on what it delivers✓ Own answers inside

Says growth has outpaced essential infrastructure and amenities and pledges to 'balance growth with what our environment can sustain.' He argues that adding supply alone has not made housing affordable. In 2024 the Squamish Chief reported that his non-profit DWIFT favours 'gentle densification' (low-rise apartments and townhomes). [source]

“Slow down growth, and focus on developing within our boundaries, so future development serves both people and the planet”
[quote source]

Limited evidence

✓ Direct answer Sean told us:

  • Squamish is growing too fast. Council should slow the pace of new development approvals.Strongly agrees

    “We've grown faster than our infrastructure and amenities can keep up with, so we need to slow down, catch up, and stop approving development just to hit provincial housing numbers.”

  • Taller buildings (above 6 storeys) should be allowed downtown and near transit and services.In the middle

    “Height isn't the question for me — it's whether a project actually delivers what residents need.”

  • Squamish should open new land and new neighbourhoods for housing, rather than adding density to existing ones.Somewhat disagrees

    “In general, I support developing within our where we can. But every new project should be judged on its own merits and whether it delivers affordability and increased quality of life for all residents”

  • Height and density should follow clear rules set in advance, rather than being negotiated project by project.Somewhat disagrees

    “Decisions like this should be made alongside residents affected by specific projects.”

Housing affordabilityStrongly for more public money and land, and a bigger required share of below-market homes; resident-restricted ownership✓ Own answers inside

Housing is his professional field. He co-founded DWIFT Housing Society to build homes and sell them at cost (reported in 2024 as 25-30% ) to middle-income households, and DWIFT sought District land on Pioneer Way for that purpose. His platform promises 'housing that locals can afford throughout their lives.' [source]

“Towns across B.C.—and the world—are getting creative in solving the housing and affordability crises, and I believe Squamish can, and must, too.”
[quote source]

Well documented

✓ Direct answer Sean told us:

  • The District should put more public money and land into non-market and housing.Strongly agrees

    “I'll increase the amount of affordable housing developers need to provide, bring resident-restricted affordable home ownership to Squamish, and leverage federal funding effectively to deliver affordable housing.”

  • Large new developments should be required to include a fixed share of homes, even if that means fewer homes get built.Strongly agrees

    “I'll increase the share of affordable units developers are required to deliver - we've seen that simply building more units has not led to housing that is more affordable, so we need to change our approach.”

  • The District should hold on to the land it owns and use it for housing, rather than selling it to fund other things.Strongly agrees

    “Our land and resources should be used for our long-term benefit, not sold off for short-term profit or to pay off government debt.”

  • Short-term rentals like Airbnb should be restricted further in Squamish.In the middle

    “I haven't heard from residents that this is a major issue, but every home taken off the long-term rental market is one less home for a local family.”

Homelessness & supportive housingBuild the Pioneer Way and Hearth and Home supportive housing; against clearing camps with nowhere to go✓ Own answers inside

He leads Zero Ceiling, which provides and employment to young adults facing homelessness in the Sea to Sky. [source]

“These are people who often fall through the cracks—but I've always found that, when we listen to what they really need, and then take action, they can thrive here just as much as anyone else.”

Limited evidence

✓ Direct answer Sean told us:

  • Squamish needs more shelter and supportive-housing spaces, even if they are located near residential areas.Somewhat agrees

    “The slated Pioneer Way and and Home projects must go ahead to meet the need, but they must be designed in partnership with residents in appropriate locations.”

  • The shelter and its services should be moved out of downtown.In the middle

    “This is a complex issue, and any decision should be made in partnership with all the people affected - including service users, social service organizations, and local neighbors - not dictated by Mayor and Council.”

  • The District should clear tent from public spaces, even when there is nowhere else for those people to go.Strongly disagrees

    “Clearing an with nowhere for people to go just moves the problem down the street — the real fix is the housing and services that prevent it in the first place, while enforcement should focus on illegal and antisocial behaviour.”

  • The District should provide a sanctioned place on public land for people living in vehicles.Strongly agrees

    “Yes - both safe spaces and a permit system for vehicle residents, built together with the people it affects, will give everyone a safe place to sleep and the right to quiet enjoyment.”

  • When public safety downtown and services for homeless people pull in different directions, safety should come first.Somewhat disagrees

    “These two things should not be pitted against each other: our approach should ensure the safety of all residents - those facing homelessness and their neighbors.”

  • Supportive and low-income housing should be spread across all neighbourhoods rather than concentrated downtown.In the middle

    “Locations should be chosen based on what makes sense for the project, which should be designed alongside both future and current residents.”

Policing & community safetyIn the middle on more RCMP and bylaw officers; strongly for crisis teams; hold everyone to the law, with services✓ Own answers inside

Sean had said little in public about this before answering our questionnaire. Sean’s own answers are below.

✓ Direct answer Sean told us:

  • Squamish should fund more RCMP officers and policing.In the middle

    “We need sufficient policing to maintain public safety, but we need to pair it with effective preventative approaches and services that address the root causes of people feeling unsafe.”

  • The District should put more bylaw enforcement officers downtown.In the middle

    “More enforcement without more support just shifts the problem — I want a downtown that's safe because people's real needs are being met.”

  • The District should fund mental-health and outreach crisis response teams alongside the RCMP.Strongly agrees

    “Government investment should address the root cause of issues, not just the symptoms. And local services need to collaborate effectively to deliver for all residents needs.”

  • The District should use bylaws to stop open drug use in parks, sidewalks and other public spaces.Somewhat agrees

    “Everyone should be held accountable to local laws, and that has to go hand in hand with real services that address why open drug use is happening in the first place.”

Taxes & spendingFreeze property taxes for 2027; against the Woodfibre tax deal as written; pay for Brennan Park through industry, not debt✓ Own answers inside

Pledges to freeze property taxes for 2027 and 'spend your dollars transparently and thoughtfully.' He criticizes the 12.8% 2026 tax increase, questions whether $21M spent at Brennan Park met residents' most pressing needs, and says the last two District capital projects ran more than $20M over budget. He also wants new recreation amenities, ideally funded through a renegotiated WLNG deal; he has not said what he would cut to fund the freeze. [source]

“...they don't feel heard, and they don't feel their tax dollars are being spent effectively to make Squamish a place where they can thrive.”

Well documented

✓ Direct answer Sean told us:

  • Keeping property tax increases at or below inflation should be a top priority, even if it means cutting services or delaying projects.Strongly agrees

    “I've pledged to freeze property taxes for 2027 after years of huge increases. Government needs to be forced to use our funds more effectively rather than putting greater pressure on residents.”

  • The District should sign the proposed 10-year tax agreement with Woodfibre LNG.Strongly disagrees

    “I called on the current Council to reject this deal so a new Council could negotiate one that actually delivers for Squamish, including a real recreation centre.”

  • Major recreation investments, like renewing Brennan Park, should go ahead even if the District has to borrow.Somewhat agrees

    “Brennan Park's real needs — a bigger pool, a second sheet of ice, better change rooms — have to get fixed, and I'll aim to fund it through a fair deal with industry instead of debt that pushes up costs for locals.”

  • Capital projects above a set cost should go to a public referendum before council approves them.In the middle

    “I agree that the public should have a say in major projects, but I plan to build more effective community engagement throughout project development, not wait until the last minute to hold a referendum.”

  • The District should borrow to renew Brennan Park now rather than wait until it can be paid for from savings.In the middle

    “Renewing Brennan Park is a huge priority, but it should be paid for by a fair deal with industry, not more public debt that will increase costs to residents in the long term.”

Climate & environmentClimate a priority, but not at residents’ short-term cost✓ Own answers inside

Sean had said little in public about this before answering our questionnaire. Sean’s own answers are below. [source]

✓ Direct answer Sean told us:

  • Climate action should be a top council priority, even when it adds cost.Somewhat agrees

    “Climate action is a crucial long-term priority: but environmental measures shouldn't make life harder or more expensive for residents in the short-term.”

  • New buildings should have to meet higher energy standards, even if that raises the cost of building.In the middle

    “This is a real trade-off between upfront cost and long-term savings that deserves thoughtful consideration for each project, not a blanket rule.”

Woodfibre LNG plantUse every tool to protect health, air and water from Woodfibre LNG✓ Own answers inside

In a Sept 14, 2026 op-ed he asked council to reject the proposed 10-year WLNG agreement, saying about $14M a year is not enough to leave a lasting asset, the money should be committed to a community-selected legacy project, and the pre-election timeline shuts out the public. He wants robust environmental monitoring of WLNG. He has not said he opposes the plant itself. [source]

“Making such a consequential decision under duress and without meaningful public engagement is irresponsible.”

Well documented

✓ Direct answer Sean told us:

  • The District should use its permit powers to press Woodfibre LNG on local impacts, even if that means delays or legal fights.Somewhat agrees

    “Woodfibre is here to stay - we need to use every tool available to ensure we protect our people's health, our air and water quality, and leave a meaningful legacy to Squamish.”

Transportation & transitFor regional transit if senior governments pay their share; pause new bike-lane spending until residents are consulted✓ Own answers inside

His platform promises to 'invest in frequent, modernized transport that meets our diverse needs', including working with BC Transit and the Province on an express bus down the highway every 15 minutes. [source]

“Partnering with BC Transit and the provincial government to establish an express bus down the highway every 15 minutes, making transit a more practical option”

Limited evidence

✓ Direct answer Sean told us:

  • Regional transit to Vancouver and Whistler is worth spending local tax dollars on.Somewhat agrees

    “Regional transit could bring huge benefit to affordability and quality of life, but I'll push provincial and federal governments to contribute their fair share.”

  • The District should spend local money on protected bike lanes and sidewalks.Somewhat disagrees

    “I'd put a moratorium on new active transportation upgrades until there's been real community engagement - residents are saying this is not a big priority for public funds while we have other pressing issues.”

ParkingBuild a parkade; paid parking for visitors, free for locals; a moratorium on parking variances✓ Own answers inside

Sean had said little in public about this before answering our questionnaire. Sean’s own answers are below.

✓ Direct answer Sean told us:

  • New buildings should have to provide enough parking for the people who live there, instead of being approved with less.Strongly agrees

    “I'll place a moratorium on parking so developers provide enough parking for the people who'll actually live there.”

  • Paid parking downtown is a fair way to manage demand for spaces.Somewhat agrees

    “We should introduce paid parking for visitors and tourists, with free parking for locals. And more importantly, we need to invest in a parkade to accommodate growing tourism.”

  • Downtown Squamish needs more public parking, and the District should get it built.Strongly agrees

    “Parking is driving people away from downtown, and identifying a location for a parkade is one of the things I want to move on - it can pay for itself in a relatively short timeframe.”

  • If Squamish brings in paid parking, residents should park free and only visitors should pay.Strongly agrees

    “Locals shouldn't have to pay more to live here and access basic amenities, including downtown. But we should leverage more revenue from tourists who come to visit our town.”

Jobs & local economyStrongly for cutting red tape, with a common-sense approach✓ Own answers inside

Platform pledges to 'support local businesses to thrive' and to 'ensure big business and industry fairly and transparently contribute to our community.' He points to the forestry era as a lesson that industry revenue must leave lasting community assets. [source]

“We need to ensure that the benefits industry brings continue to serve Squamish long after that industry leaves.”

Some evidence

✓ Direct answer Sean told us:

  • The District should cut red tape and speed up permits for builders and businesses.Strongly agrees

    “I constantly hear that red tape slow down residents who want to contribute to our community. I'll take a common-sense approach that enforces expectations without cumbersome bureaucracy.”

  • Land set aside for industry and jobs should be protected from being rezoned for housing.In the middle

    “Squamish needs both thriving industry and residents who can afford to live here - we should be open-minded about the best use of each piece of land in the long-term.”

Compare everyone on: growth and development · housing · homelessness and supportive housing · policing and community safety · property taxes and spending · climate and the environment · the Woodfibre LNG plant · transit and Highway 99 · parking · jobs and the local economy.

Sean’s own priority list
  1. Affordable Living: housing locals can afford, modernized transport, freeze property taxes for 2027
  2. Accessible Amenities: splash park, indoor playground, fitness centre; care and services close to home
  3. Accountable Leadership: authentic engagement, transparency, industry paying its fair share
  4. Now and for generations to come: balance growth with what the environment can sustain
  5. Resident-centered governance: measure success by outcomes for residents, not completed processes

In Sean’s own words ✓ Direct

If you achieve only one thing in four years, what is it?
Making Squamish tangibly more affordable for residents on average incomes.
Name something you will vote against, even if it is popular.
My vote will always align with the greatest needs of residents, and I'll ensure I'm engaging with them to understand how I'll vote: the job of Mayor is to represent them. I'll strive to build consensus among Mayor and Council so we can make the right decisions and move on to action.
Squamish’s sharpest argument: what would you actually do about encampments, Under One Roof and street disorder, and what would it cost?
and street disorder come from the same root cause: not nearly enough housing people can afford. My plan is to expedite Pioneer Way's , get and Home built with community input on location, and have RCMP, bylaw, and social services working the same plan instead of separate ones — while holding everyone accountable to the law. I don't have a costed number to give you today, and I won't invent one. Instead, I'll work to leverage all available provincial and federal funding - including already committed funding - to ensure minimal cost falls on Squamish taxpayers.
One council decision from the last four years you’d have made differently, and what you’d have done.
The Brennan Park renovation. The District spent $21 million — $3 million over budget — and it didn't address what residents actually told them they needed: a bigger pool, a second sheet of ice, better change rooms. I'd have included a new recreation centre in any proposed deal with Woodfibre, then tied spending directly to those stated priorities before a shovel went in the ground. I also would have engaged residents in the design process from the beginning, to ensure that we sought and leveraged funding to deliver what they actually need.
What would you say to a resident on the other side of your biggest issue?
In my experience talking with residents, most of want the same thing: a town that's affordable, with the amenities we need, where everyone feels safe. The disagreement is usually about how to get there, and that's a conversation worth having properly - I'd want to understand what needs they have that are driving their perspective, and how I can take their needs into consideration.
Your one line pitch
Building a Squamish that's affordable, accessible, and accountable - now and for generations to come.

Sean explains their answers ✓ Direct

Sean added a comment to 38 of the statements we put to every candidate. These are Sean’s words, unedited.

  • Squamish is growing too fast. Council should slow the pace of new development approvals.Strongly agrees

    “We've grown faster than our infrastructure and amenities can keep up with, so we need to slow down, catch up, and stop approving development just to hit provincial housing numbers.”

  • Taller buildings (above 6 storeys) should be allowed downtown and near transit and services.In the middle

    “Height isn't the question for me — it's whether a project actually delivers what residents need.”

  • Squamish should open new land and new neighbourhoods for housing, rather than adding density to existing ones.Somewhat disagrees

    “In general, I support developing within our where we can. But every new project should be judged on its own merits and whether it delivers affordability and increased quality of life for all residents”

  • The District should put more public money and land into non-market and housing.Strongly agrees

    “I'll increase the amount of affordable housing developers need to provide, bring resident-restricted affordable home ownership to Squamish, and leverage federal funding effectively to deliver affordable housing.”

Show 34 more
  • Squamish needs more shelter and supportive-housing spaces, even if they are located near residential areas.Somewhat agrees

    “The slated Pioneer Way and and Home projects must go ahead to meet the need, but they must be designed in partnership with residents in appropriate locations.”

  • Squamish should fund more RCMP officers and policing.In the middle

    “We need sufficient policing to maintain public safety, but we need to pair it with effective preventative approaches and services that address the root causes of people feeling unsafe.”

  • Keeping property tax increases at or below inflation should be a top priority, even if it means cutting services or delaying projects.Strongly agrees

    “I've pledged to freeze property taxes for 2027 after years of huge increases. Government needs to be forced to use our funds more effectively rather than putting greater pressure on residents.”

  • The District should sign the proposed 10-year tax agreement with Woodfibre LNG.Strongly disagrees

    “I called on the current Council to reject this deal so a new Council could negotiate one that actually delivers for Squamish, including a real recreation centre.”

  • The District should use its permit powers to press Woodfibre LNG on local impacts, even if that means delays or legal fights.Somewhat agrees

    “Woodfibre is here to stay - we need to use every tool available to ensure we protect our people's health, our air and water quality, and leave a meaningful legacy to Squamish.”

  • Climate action should be a top council priority, even when it adds cost.Somewhat agrees

    “Climate action is a crucial long-term priority: but environmental measures shouldn't make life harder or more expensive for residents in the short-term.”

  • The District should cut red tape and speed up permits for builders and businesses.Strongly agrees

    “I constantly hear that red tape slow down residents who want to contribute to our community. I'll take a common-sense approach that enforces expectations without cumbersome bureaucracy.”

  • Regional transit to Vancouver and Whistler is worth spending local tax dollars on.Somewhat agrees

    “Regional transit could bring huge benefit to affordability and quality of life, but I'll push provincial and federal governments to contribute their fair share.”

  • New buildings should have to provide enough parking for the people who live there, instead of being approved with less.Strongly agrees

    “I'll place a moratorium on parking so developers provide enough parking for the people who'll actually live there.”

  • Major recreation investments, like renewing Brennan Park, should go ahead even if the District has to borrow.Somewhat agrees

    “Brennan Park's real needs — a bigger pool, a second sheet of ice, better change rooms — have to get fixed, and I'll aim to fund it through a fair deal with industry instead of debt that pushes up costs for locals.”

  • The shelter and its services should be moved out of downtown.In the middle

    “This is a complex issue, and any decision should be made in partnership with all the people affected - including service users, social service organizations, and local neighbors - not dictated by Mayor and Council.”

  • The District should clear tent from public spaces, even when there is nowhere else for those people to go.Strongly disagrees

    “Clearing an with nowhere for people to go just moves the problem down the street — the real fix is the housing and services that prevent it in the first place, while enforcement should focus on illegal and antisocial behaviour.”

  • Spending on inclusion and community symbols (such as rainbow crosswalks, flags and proclamations) is a good use of District money.In the middle

    “Making Squamish a place where everyone feels safe is important - but residents haven't raised this as a major need currently.”

  • Large new developments should be required to include a fixed share of homes, even if that means fewer homes get built.Strongly agrees

    “I'll increase the share of affordable units developers are required to deliver - we've seen that simply building more units has not led to housing that is more affordable, so we need to change our approach.”

  • Height and density should follow clear rules set in advance, rather than being negotiated project by project.Somewhat disagrees

    “Decisions like this should be made alongside residents affected by specific projects.”

  • The District should hold on to the land it owns and use it for housing, rather than selling it to fund other things.Strongly agrees

    “Our land and resources should be used for our long-term benefit, not sold off for short-term profit or to pay off government debt.”

  • Short-term rentals like Airbnb should be restricted further in Squamish.In the middle

    “I haven't heard from residents that this is a major issue, but every home taken off the long-term rental market is one less home for a local family.”

  • The District should provide a sanctioned place on public land for people living in vehicles.Strongly agrees

    “Yes - both safe spaces and a permit system for vehicle residents, built together with the people it affects, will give everyone a safe place to sleep and the right to quiet enjoyment.”

  • The District should put more bylaw enforcement officers downtown.In the middle

    “More enforcement without more support just shifts the problem — I want a downtown that's safe because people's real needs are being met.”

  • The District should fund mental-health and outreach crisis response teams alongside the RCMP.Strongly agrees

    “Government investment should address the root cause of issues, not just the symptoms. And local services need to collaborate effectively to deliver for all residents needs.”

  • Capital projects above a set cost should go to a public referendum before council approves them.In the middle

    “I agree that the public should have a say in major projects, but I plan to build more effective community engagement throughout project development, not wait until the last minute to hold a referendum.”

  • The District should borrow to renew Brennan Park now rather than wait until it can be paid for from savings.In the middle

    “Renewing Brennan Park is a huge priority, but it should be paid for by a fair deal with industry, not more public debt that will increase costs to residents in the long term.”

  • New buildings should have to meet higher energy standards, even if that raises the cost of building.In the middle

    “This is a real trade-off between upfront cost and long-term savings that deserves thoughtful consideration for each project, not a blanket rule.”

  • Paid parking downtown is a fair way to manage demand for spaces.Somewhat agrees

    “We should introduce paid parking for visitors and tourists, with free parking for locals. And more importantly, we need to invest in a parkade to accommodate growing tourism.”

  • Downtown Squamish needs more public parking, and the District should get it built.Strongly agrees

    “Parking is driving people away from downtown, and identifying a location for a parkade is one of the things I want to move on - it can pay for itself in a relatively short timeframe.”

  • If Squamish brings in paid parking, residents should park free and only visitors should pay.Strongly agrees

    “Locals shouldn't have to pay more to live here and access basic amenities, including downtown. But we should leverage more revenue from tourists who come to visit our town.”

  • The District should spend local money on protected bike lanes and sidewalks.Somewhat disagrees

    “I'd put a moratorium on new active transportation upgrades until there's been real community engagement - residents are saying this is not a big priority for public funds while we have other pressing issues.”

  • Land set aside for industry and jobs should be protected from being rezoned for housing.In the middle

    “Squamish needs both thriving industry and residents who can afford to live here - we should be open-minded about the best use of each piece of land in the long-term.”

  • The District should increase spending on dikes and flood protection, even if it means higher taxes.In the middle

    “Flood protection is essential infrastructure, but I'll look at how to fund it without piling more cost onto residents who are already stretched.”

  • The District should formalize shared decision-making with the Squamish Nation on land use.Strongly agrees

    “The Squamish Nation are our closest neighbors and partners: working more effectively with them will lead to better outcomes for all of us.”

  • The District should actively work to expand subsidized childcare spaces.Somewhat agrees

    “Childcare is a huge need, and we should prioritize projects that deliver greater affordability to residents.”

  • When public safety downtown and services for homeless people pull in different directions, safety should come first.Somewhat disagrees

    “These two things should not be pitted against each other: our approach should ensure the safety of all residents - those facing homelessness and their neighbors.”

  • Supportive and low-income housing should be spread across all neighbourhoods rather than concentrated downtown.In the middle

    “Locations should be chosen based on what makes sense for the project, which should be designed alongside both future and current residents.”

  • The District should use bylaws to stop open drug use in parks, sidewalks and other public spaces.Somewhat agrees

    “Everyone should be held accountable to local laws, and that has to go hand in hand with real services that address why open drug use is happening in the first place.”

Sean answered all 38 statements we put to every candidate. The answers with comments are above. Tap below for the full list.

All 38 of Sean’s questionnaire answers ✓ Direct
  • Squamish is growing too fast. Council should slow the pace of new development approvals.Strongly agrees

    “We've grown faster than our infrastructure and amenities can keep up with, so we need to slow down, catch up, and stop approving development just to hit provincial housing numbers.”

  • Taller buildings (above 6 storeys) should be allowed downtown and near transit and services.In the middle

    “Height isn't the question for me — it's whether a project actually delivers what residents need.”

  • Squamish should open new land and new neighbourhoods for housing, rather than adding density to existing ones.Somewhat disagrees

    “In general, I support developing within our where we can. But every new project should be judged on its own merits and whether it delivers affordability and increased quality of life for all residents”

  • The District should put more public money and land into non-market and housing.Strongly agrees

    “I'll increase the amount of affordable housing developers need to provide, bring resident-restricted affordable home ownership to Squamish, and leverage federal funding effectively to deliver affordable housing.”

  • Squamish needs more shelter and supportive-housing spaces, even if they are located near residential areas.Somewhat agrees

    “The slated Pioneer Way and and Home projects must go ahead to meet the need, but they must be designed in partnership with residents in appropriate locations.”

  • Squamish should fund more RCMP officers and policing.In the middle

    “We need sufficient policing to maintain public safety, but we need to pair it with effective preventative approaches and services that address the root causes of people feeling unsafe.”

  • Keeping property tax increases at or below inflation should be a top priority, even if it means cutting services or delaying projects.Strongly agrees

    “I've pledged to freeze property taxes for 2027 after years of huge increases. Government needs to be forced to use our funds more effectively rather than putting greater pressure on residents.”

  • The District should sign the proposed 10-year tax agreement with Woodfibre LNG.Strongly disagrees

    “I called on the current Council to reject this deal so a new Council could negotiate one that actually delivers for Squamish, including a real recreation centre.”

  • The District should use its permit powers to press Woodfibre LNG on local impacts, even if that means delays or legal fights.Somewhat agrees

    “Woodfibre is here to stay - we need to use every tool available to ensure we protect our people's health, our air and water quality, and leave a meaningful legacy to Squamish.”

  • Climate action should be a top council priority, even when it adds cost.Somewhat agrees

    “Climate action is a crucial long-term priority: but environmental measures shouldn't make life harder or more expensive for residents in the short-term.”

  • The District should cut red tape and speed up permits for builders and businesses.Strongly agrees

    “I constantly hear that red tape slow down residents who want to contribute to our community. I'll take a common-sense approach that enforces expectations without cumbersome bureaucracy.”

  • Regional transit to Vancouver and Whistler is worth spending local tax dollars on.Somewhat agrees

    “Regional transit could bring huge benefit to affordability and quality of life, but I'll push provincial and federal governments to contribute their fair share.”

  • New buildings should have to provide enough parking for the people who live there, instead of being approved with less.Strongly agrees

    “I'll place a moratorium on parking so developers provide enough parking for the people who'll actually live there.”

  • Major recreation investments, like renewing Brennan Park, should go ahead even if the District has to borrow.Somewhat agrees

    “Brennan Park's real needs — a bigger pool, a second sheet of ice, better change rooms — have to get fixed, and I'll aim to fund it through a fair deal with industry instead of debt that pushes up costs for locals.”

  • The shelter and its services should be moved out of downtown.In the middle

    “This is a complex issue, and any decision should be made in partnership with all the people affected - including service users, social service organizations, and local neighbors - not dictated by Mayor and Council.”

  • The District should clear tent from public spaces, even when there is nowhere else for those people to go.Strongly disagrees

    “Clearing an with nowhere for people to go just moves the problem down the street — the real fix is the housing and services that prevent it in the first place, while enforcement should focus on illegal and antisocial behaviour.”

  • Spending on inclusion and community symbols (such as rainbow crosswalks, flags and proclamations) is a good use of District money.In the middle

    “Making Squamish a place where everyone feels safe is important - but residents haven't raised this as a major need currently.”

  • Large new developments should be required to include a fixed share of homes, even if that means fewer homes get built.Strongly agrees

    “I'll increase the share of affordable units developers are required to deliver - we've seen that simply building more units has not led to housing that is more affordable, so we need to change our approach.”

  • Height and density should follow clear rules set in advance, rather than being negotiated project by project.Somewhat disagrees

    “Decisions like this should be made alongside residents affected by specific projects.”

  • The District should hold on to the land it owns and use it for housing, rather than selling it to fund other things.Strongly agrees

    “Our land and resources should be used for our long-term benefit, not sold off for short-term profit or to pay off government debt.”

  • Short-term rentals like Airbnb should be restricted further in Squamish.In the middle

    “I haven't heard from residents that this is a major issue, but every home taken off the long-term rental market is one less home for a local family.”

  • The District should provide a sanctioned place on public land for people living in vehicles.Strongly agrees

    “Yes - both safe spaces and a permit system for vehicle residents, built together with the people it affects, will give everyone a safe place to sleep and the right to quiet enjoyment.”

  • The District should put more bylaw enforcement officers downtown.In the middle

    “More enforcement without more support just shifts the problem — I want a downtown that's safe because people's real needs are being met.”

  • The District should fund mental-health and outreach crisis response teams alongside the RCMP.Strongly agrees

    “Government investment should address the root cause of issues, not just the symptoms. And local services need to collaborate effectively to deliver for all residents needs.”

  • Capital projects above a set cost should go to a public referendum before council approves them.In the middle

    “I agree that the public should have a say in major projects, but I plan to build more effective community engagement throughout project development, not wait until the last minute to hold a referendum.”

  • The District should borrow to renew Brennan Park now rather than wait until it can be paid for from savings.In the middle

    “Renewing Brennan Park is a huge priority, but it should be paid for by a fair deal with industry, not more public debt that will increase costs to residents in the long term.”

  • New buildings should have to meet higher energy standards, even if that raises the cost of building.In the middle

    “This is a real trade-off between upfront cost and long-term savings that deserves thoughtful consideration for each project, not a blanket rule.”

  • Paid parking downtown is a fair way to manage demand for spaces.Somewhat agrees

    “We should introduce paid parking for visitors and tourists, with free parking for locals. And more importantly, we need to invest in a parkade to accommodate growing tourism.”

  • Downtown Squamish needs more public parking, and the District should get it built.Strongly agrees

    “Parking is driving people away from downtown, and identifying a location for a parkade is one of the things I want to move on - it can pay for itself in a relatively short timeframe.”

  • If Squamish brings in paid parking, residents should park free and only visitors should pay.Strongly agrees

    “Locals shouldn't have to pay more to live here and access basic amenities, including downtown. But we should leverage more revenue from tourists who come to visit our town.”

  • The District should spend local money on protected bike lanes and sidewalks.Somewhat disagrees

    “I'd put a moratorium on new active transportation upgrades until there's been real community engagement - residents are saying this is not a big priority for public funds while we have other pressing issues.”

  • Land set aside for industry and jobs should be protected from being rezoned for housing.In the middle

    “Squamish needs both thriving industry and residents who can afford to live here - we should be open-minded about the best use of each piece of land in the long-term.”

  • The District should increase spending on dikes and flood protection, even if it means higher taxes.In the middle

    “Flood protection is essential infrastructure, but I'll look at how to fund it without piling more cost onto residents who are already stretched.”

  • The District should formalize shared decision-making with the Squamish Nation on land use.Strongly agrees

    “The Squamish Nation are our closest neighbors and partners: working more effectively with them will lead to better outcomes for all of us.”

  • The District should actively work to expand subsidized childcare spaces.Somewhat agrees

    “Childcare is a huge need, and we should prioritize projects that deliver greater affordability to residents.”

  • When public safety downtown and services for homeless people pull in different directions, safety should come first.Somewhat disagrees

    “These two things should not be pitted against each other: our approach should ensure the safety of all residents - those facing homelessness and their neighbors.”

  • Supportive and low-income housing should be spread across all neighbourhoods rather than concentrated downtown.In the middle

    “Locations should be chosen based on what makes sense for the project, which should be designed alongside both future and current residents.”

  • The District should use bylaws to stop open drug use in parks, sidewalks and other public spaces.Somewhat agrees

    “Everyone should be held accountable to local laws, and that has to go hand in hand with real services that address why open drug use is happening in the first place.”

Answered by Sean Easton on September 25, 2026. Where these differ from our earlier reading of the public record, the candidate’s own answer is what counts in the quiz and compare pages.

Questions about Sean Easton

  • Who is the mayor of Squamish?

    Sean Easton is the mayor of Squamish, elected on October 17, 2026 with 3,681 votes (41.9%). The term runs to the October 2030 election.

  • When does Sean Easton take office?

    Sean Easton is sworn in with the new council at the inaugural meeting on November 3, 2026 at 6 p.m. at Squamish Valley Golf Club, 2458 Mamquam Road.

  • What did Sean Easton promise?

    We track 11 promises Sean made during the 2026 campaign, including: Put air and water monitoring stations around town to track possible effects from Woodfibre LNG; Pause approval of new developments unless they clearly make life better and more affordable; Speed up the Pioneer Way supportive housing project. Each one is marked kept or not kept by how Sean votes, not by what council as a whole decides.

  • How has Sean Easton voted on council?

    Council hasn’t voted yet. The first regular meeting is November 17, 2026. Every vote Sean casts will be listed on this page.

  • How much is the mayor of Squamish paid?

    In 2025 the mayor was paid $103,946, not counting expenses and benefits, according to the District of Squamish financial statement.

About Sean

Co-Executive Director of Zero Ceiling, a Whistler-based non-profit working to end youth homelessness (he took on leadership in 2017), and co-founder of DWIFT Housing Society, a Squamish non-profit aiming to sell homes at cost. He arrived in Squamish in 2011 as a whitewater rafting guide, later trained as a youth worker, co-built the multi-generational 'Heart House' with family, and recently launched the engagement collective Residents United.

Where Sean leans on money, growth and LNG
Homelessnessleans “more shelters, even near homes · let camps stay”
◀ More shelters, even near homes · let camps stayMove shelters out of downtown · clear camps ▶
Moneyleans “invest in services”
◀ Invest in servicesHold taxes down ▶
Growthin the middle
◀ Slow down, be cautiousBuild more, faster ▶
The Woodfibre tax dealclearly “reject or renegotiate it”
◀ Reject or renegotiate itSign it ▶
Climate & environmentleans “climate first”
◀ Keep costs downClimate first ▶

Worked out from Sean’s public statements and votes, not a label they chose. See everyone side by side · Who on council thinks like you? Take the quiz.

Sources we used (10)

Are you Sean Easton, or did you spot a mistake? Email squamishvoters@gmail.com to update or add to this page. How corrections work.