← The whole council

Janice DesJardins is a Squamish councillor, elected on October 17, 2026 with 3,688 votes, 6th of 15 council candidates, for a term to 2030. Background: Long-time Squamish resident and volunteer whose family roots in town date to 1912; her grandfather Alex Munro founded the volunteer fire department and was its first chief.

Takes office
November 3, 2026, at the inaugural council meeting
Pay
$46,926 a year (each councillor’s pay in 2025, before expenses and benefits) [District of Squamish]
Record
10 campaign promises tracked · 0 council votes so far

Janice’s roles on council

Not appointed yet. Council usually decides who serves as acting mayor, who sits on the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District board, and who joins which committees at or soon after the swearing in on November 3, 2026. We’ll list Janice’s roles here once the District publishes them.

How council works: no one on council, not even the mayor, decides alone.

Janice’s record on council

Council hasn’t voted yet. We’re tracking 10 promises and 44 positions on file for Janice (40 in Janice’s own words). First meeting: November 3, 2026.

Janice’s promises 10

What Janice promised during the campaign, in plain words. Tap one for the exact quote and source.

Not tested yetSeek a negotiated settlement and a reset with Woodfibre LNG on taxes, worker housing and amenities.Who decides: Woodfibre LNG and council

What Janice said:

“I would go after a negotiated settlement and a real reset: a fair, predictable tax arrangement, a workable approach to worker accommodation, and community amenity contributions back on the table”
[source]

Janice’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she votes for a negotiated agreement with Woodfibre LNG covering taxes and amenities when one comes to council. Not kept if she votes against one.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether the District and Woodfibre LNG reach a new agreement. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Janice: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Woodfibre LNG and council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetStart considering the Cheema lands and Fast properties for housing on higher ground.

What Janice said:

“We should start considering Fast Properties and Cheema Lands to avoid overbuilding on the floodplain.”
[source]

Janice’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she votes to let proposals for the Cheema lands or Fast properties be reviewed. Not kept if she votes to stop them being reviewed.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether council reviews proposals for those lands. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Janice: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetKeep the six homes with no parking zoning switched off until frequent buses actually run.Who decides: Council, within provincial housing law

What Janice said:

“Keep the six-homes-no-parking zoning dormant until frequent buses are actually running.”
[source]

Janice’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she votes against turning on the six homes, no parking zoning before frequent buses run. Not kept if she votes for it.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether that zoning stays switched off. Provincial housing law sets some of these rules. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Janice: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council, within provincial housing law

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetBring a permit for local people living in vehicles to a decision, with a date.

What Janice said:

“I would bring it back with an actual decision and a date attached.”
[source]

Janice’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she moves or seconds a motion to bring a residents only vehicle permit to council for a vote with a start date. Not kept if she votes against bringing it forward.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether council votes on such a permit. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Janice: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetStart a land bank now for worker housing and housing society projects.

What Janice said:

“I also am for creating a land bank starting now for future employee housing, and housing society projects.”
[source]

Janice’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she moves, seconds or votes for a land bank, or for buying or reserving land, for worker and non profit housing. Not kept if she votes against it.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether council sets up a land bank or reserves land. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Janice: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetVote against any more parking variances, and rewrite the parking bylaw for Squamish.

What Janice said:

“No more parking variances. Review the bylaw and amend it to Squamish's needs.”
[source]

Janice’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she votes against each request to cut required parking. Not kept if she votes for one. We show the count, for example 4 of 5.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching how many parking variances council approves. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Janice: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetMove restaurant patios off street parking and stop food trucks parking on Cleveland and 2nd.

What Janice said:

“Right away, I would move restaurant seating off the street onto the sidewalk and stop food trucks from parking on Cleveland and 2nd between Victoria and Pemberton.”
[source]

Janice’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she moves or seconds a motion to take patios off parking stalls and bar food trucks from Cleveland and 2nd, and votes for it. Not kept if she votes against it.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether council makes these changes. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Janice: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetPush council to set up a community parking committee right away.

What Janice said:

“I will push Council to immediately strike a community Parking Committee made up of three downtown business owners, three homeowners from affected neighbourhoods, two Councillors, and the department head responsible for roads.”
[source]

Janice’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she moves or seconds a motion early in the term to create a community parking committee, or votes for one. Not kept if she votes against it.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching whether council sets up the committee. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Janice: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetDirect staff to bring a budget with no property tax increase over last year.

What Janice said:

“Direct Staff to bring a budget to Council that reflects zero increase over last year.”
[source]

Janice’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she moves or votes for a budget with no property tax increase, and votes against budgets that raise it. Not kept if she votes for a budget with an increase.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching the property tax increase in each budget council adopts, as the District reports it. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Janice: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Not tested yetSend any big Brennan Park expansion to a referendum, not an alternate approval process.

What Janice said:

“And if a big expansion is on the table, it goes to a referendum, not an alternate approval process.”
[source]

Janice’s part (the only thing we mark): Kept if she votes for a referendum, and against an alternative approval process, when council borrows for a big recreation expansion. Not kept if she votes the other way.

Did it happen? Not yet. We’re watching how council asks voters before borrowing for Brennan Park. This is a plain fact, never a mark against Janice: council decides as a group.

Who decides: Council

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Do Janice’s votes match what they said in the campaign?

Janice skipped 4 of the statements in our questionnaire. So we split the 44 things on file: 40 in Janice’s own words, which get checked against new votes, and 4 that are our reading of Janice’s record, which are shown but never marked.

See all 44 (40 checked against votes)

Things Janice said (40)Checked against every new vote.

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Squamish is growing too fast. Council should slow the pace of new development approvals.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly disagreed: “Taller buildings (above 6 storeys) should be allowed downtown and near transit and services.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Squamish should open new land and new neighbourhoods for housing, rather than adding density to existing ones.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetDisagreed: “The District should put more public money and land into non-market and below-market housing.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetDisagreed: “Squamish needs more shelter and supportive-housing spaces, even if they are located near residential areas.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetAgreed: “Keeping property tax increases at or below inflation should be a top priority, even if it means cutting services or delaying projects.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetAgreed: “The District should cut red tape and speed up permits for builders and businesses.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Regional transit to Vancouver and Whistler is worth spending local tax dollars on.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “New buildings should have to provide enough parking for the people who live there, instead of being approved with less.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly agreed: “Major recreation investments, like renewing Brennan Park, should go ahead even if the District has to borrow.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetStrongly disagreed: “The Under One Roof shelter and its services should be moved out of downtown.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetAgreed: “The District should clear tent encampments from public spaces, even when there is nowhere else for those people to go.”

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Striving for zero annual property tax increases, using zero-based budgeting and focusing on needs not wants

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Referendums on major capital projects (e.g. the public safety building)

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Putting high density in new developments, and developing outside the existing OCP boundary to get out of the flood plain onto higher ground

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Starting a land bank now (possibly via Crown land) for future employee housing and housing society projects, following Whistler's model

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Attracting industry as an 'economic engine' that brings well-paid jobs and tax revenue

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: A downtown parking committee of stakeholders plus one councillor; using empty stalls in downtown residential buildings

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Renegotiating the Woodfibre LNG 10-year tax agreement under a new council to get more money for Squamish

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: More openness: a regular 'Council Corner' newspaper column, all letters to council on the agenda, public meetings on land use, an independent committee for code-of-conduct complaints

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: An annual 'How are we doing?' questionnaire to residents

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: 'Missing middle' housing (townhouses, duplexes, triplexes and low-rise apartments) throughout the community, with updated zoning and streamlined approvals

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Protecting existing rental stock, incentives for purpose-built rental, and stopping the loss of affordable units to short-term rentals and renovictions

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Higher affordable-housing requirements and stronger community-benefit agreements in new developments, plus a Housing Action Plan with targets, timelines and public progress reports

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: More frequent buses on core routes, evening and weekend service, better coverage of newer neighbourhoods, and exploring express regional service with BC Transit and TransLink

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: A Seniors Advisory Council (as council did for youth) and implementing the Age Friendly Community Plan council endorsed

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Mayor and council lobbying Victoria 'long and hard' for the cancelled 152-bed long-term care facility, and directing staff to seek private and BC Housing partners for more assisted living

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Ground-level, wheelchair-accessible seniors' housing near shops and services, with Eagle Grove as the model and new developments contributing land or money

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Funding core services and the infrastructure maintenance backlog before adding new programs; a business case, competitive procurement and honest over-budget reporting for every major spend

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: A needs assessment and public consultation before deciding whether to repair, renew or replace Brennan Park, paid for through grants, partnerships, naming rights and phased financing

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Moving restaurant patios off street parking stalls and banning food trucks from parking on Cleveland and 2nd Avenues between Victoria and Pemberton

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they support: Implementing the District's existing Heritage Management Strategy before development pressure makes it too late

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they’re against: High density in existing, long-established neighbourhoods that do not want it

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they’re against: The Woodfibre LNG 10-Year Agreement in Principle as negotiated ("That is not a good deal for Squamish")

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they’re against: The alternative approval process for borrowing, which she called "a joke", citing the public works building she says came in $19 million over budget

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they’re against: Staff having too much authority ("Council have given Staff too much authority and council must take it back")

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they’re against: Further increases to District debt and continued property tax increases

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they’re against: Housing vulnerable seniors together with people with serious mental-health and substance-use disorders in the proposed Government Road supportive housing project (2025 letter)

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they’re against: Removing any more parking stalls near seniors' facilities and seniors' housing; 'particularly not to put in bike lanes'

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Not tested yetSaid they’re against: Deferred maintenance, which she calls 'a debt that future taxpayers will pay with interest'

Council hasn’t voted on anything that tests this yet.

Where they said it

Our reading of Janice’s record (4)Not Janice’s own answers. Shown for context, never marked.

Our reading, not markedWe read Janice as agreeing: “Large new developments should be required to include a fixed share of below-market homes, even if that means fewer homes get built.”

This is our reading of the public record, not Janice’s own answer, so it is never checked against votes.

Our reading, not markedWe read Janice as agreeing: “Short-term rentals like Airbnb should be restricted further in Squamish.”

This is our reading of the public record, not Janice’s own answer, so it is never checked against votes.

Our reading, not markedWe read Janice as strongly agreeing: “Capital projects above a set cost should go to a public referendum before council approves them.”

This is our reading of the public record, not Janice’s own answer, so it is never checked against votes.

Our reading, not markedWe read Janice as agreeing: “Downtown Squamish needs more public parking, and the District should get it built.”

This is our reading of the public record, not Janice’s own answer, so it is never checked against votes.

What Janice said during the 2026 campaign

✓ Verified: in Janice’s own words. Janice filled in our candidate questionnaire on October 6, 2026. It was sent from the email address Janice filed with the District of Squamish. Everything marked ✓ Direct answer below is Janice’s own answer, not our reading of the public record. Jump to all answers.

Our summary of what Janice has said and done in public. Tap [source] on any line to check it yourself.

Said they support

  • Striving for zero annual property tax increases, using and focusing on needs not wants [source]
  • Referendums on major capital projects (e.g. the public safety building) [source]
  • Putting high density in new developments, and developing outside the existing boundary to get out of the flood plain onto higher ground [source]
Show 17 more
  • Starting a land bank now (possibly via Crown land) for future employee housing and housing society projects, following Whistler's model [source]
  • Attracting industry as an 'economic engine' that brings well-paid jobs and tax revenue [source]
  • A downtown parking committee of stakeholders plus one councillor; using empty stalls in downtown residential buildings [source]
  • Renegotiating the Woodfibre LNG 10-year tax agreement under a new council to get more money for Squamish [source]
  • More openness: a regular 'Council Corner' newspaper column, all letters to council on the agenda, public meetings on land use, an independent committee for code-of-conduct complaints [source]
  • An annual 'How are we doing?' questionnaire to residents [source]
  • 'Missing middle' housing (townhouses, duplexes, triplexes and low-rise apartments) throughout the community, with updated zoning and streamlined approvals [source]
  • Protecting existing rental stock, incentives for purpose-built rental, and stopping the loss of affordable units to short-term rentals and renovictions [source]
  • Higher affordable-housing requirements and stronger community-benefit agreements in new developments, plus a Housing Action Plan with targets, timelines and public progress reports [source]
  • More frequent buses on core routes, evening and weekend service, better coverage of newer neighbourhoods, and exploring express regional service with BC Transit and TransLink [source]
  • A Seniors Advisory Council (as council did for youth) and implementing the Age Friendly Community Plan council endorsed [source]
  • Mayor and council lobbying Victoria 'long and hard' for the cancelled 152-bed long-term care facility, and directing staff to seek private and BC Housing partners for more assisted living [source]
  • Ground-level, wheelchair-accessible seniors' housing near shops and services, with Eagle Grove as the model and new developments contributing land or money [source]
  • Funding core services and the infrastructure maintenance backlog before adding new programs; a business case, competitive procurement and honest over-budget reporting for every major spend [source]
  • A needs assessment and public consultation before deciding whether to repair, renew or replace Brennan Park, paid for through grants, partnerships, naming rights and phased financing [source]
  • Moving restaurant patios off street parking stalls and banning food trucks from parking on Cleveland and 2nd Avenues between Victoria and Pemberton [source]
  • Implementing the District's existing Heritage Management Strategy before development pressure makes it too late [source]

Said they’re against

  • High density in existing, long-established neighbourhoods that do not want it [source]
  • The Woodfibre LNG 10-Year Agreement in Principle as negotiated ("That is not a good deal for Squamish") [source]
  • The alternative approval process for borrowing, which she called "a joke", citing the public works building she says came in $19 million over budget [source]
Show 5 more
  • Staff having too much authority ("Council have given Staff too much authority and council must take it back") [source]
  • Further increases to District debt and continued property tax increases [source]
  • Housing vulnerable seniors together with people with serious mental-health and substance-use disorders in the proposed Government Road project (2025 letter) [source]
  • Removing any more parking stalls near seniors' facilities and seniors' housing; 'particularly not to put in bike lanes' [source]
  • Deferred maintenance, which she calls 'a debt that future taxpayers will pay with interest' [source]

Where Janice said they stand

Each topic opens up: tap it for the detail, quotes and sources.

Growth & developmentBuild out (new neighbourhoods / greenfield)✓ Own answers inside

Wants high density placed in new developments rather than in established neighbourhoods that do not want it, and supports development outside the current boundary to get off the flood plain onto higher ground. [source]

“High density should be in new developments and not in existing, long established neighbourhoods who do not want it. I believe in development outside of our existing in order to get outside of the flood plain and to higher ground.”

Well documented

✓ Direct answer Janice told us:

  • Squamish is growing too fast. Council should slow the pace of new development approvals.Strongly agrees

    “Existing infrastructure does not meet our needs....roads, sidewalks, transit, hospital, seniors care, schools, need to be in place before we increase our density.”

  • Taller buildings (above 6 storeys) should be allowed downtown and near transit and services.Strongly disagrees

    “People move here for the lifestyle and part of that is view scapes. Let us keep that which remains. Build smaller and lower for awhile.”

  • Squamish should open new land and new neighbourhoods for housing, rather than adding density to existing ones.Strongly agrees

    “Our neighbourhoods were established by the people who lived here. Do not destroy the ambiance and sense of community which is so important.”

Housing affordabilityLand bank for employee and housing-society housing (Whistler model)✓ Own answers inside

Says Squamish has done the paperwork on affordable housing but barely delivered, and that zoning reform alone does not make anything affordable. Wants a land bank, possibly from Crown land, for employee housing, co-op style ownership and housing society projects, citing Whistler. Her site's housing page adds: 'missing middle' townhouses and low-rise 'throughout the community' with streamlined approvals, protecting rental stock from short-term rentals and renovictions, higher affordable-housing requirements in new developments, and a Housing Action Plan with targets and public reporting. [source]

“Zoning reform makes building possible, it doesn't make anything affordable. That takes land, covenants, and capital. And those are the three boxes still unticked in Squamish.”

Well documented

✓ Direct answer Janice told us:

  • The District should put more public money and land into non-market and housing.Somewhat disagrees

    “The District should only put land into a project that is a community amenity. Land that is zoned industrial should be saved for an opportunity that will provide permanent jobs. Other municipal land should be used for partnerships that support seniors housing and housing for households making less than the median income.”

Homelessness & supportive housingOpposed mixing seniors with mental-health/addictions clients in the Government Road supportive housing proposal✓ Own answers inside

In a July 2025 letter she said she supports safe, affordable housing for people in need, including people experiencing homelessness, but called it a 'grave mistake' to house vulnerable seniors with people who may be actively struggling with serious mental-health and substance-use disorders, and argued addictions care needs specialized, secure facilities. No 2026 campaign statement on shelters or found. [source]

“This is not about NIMBYism. It's about responsible, evidence-based, and compassionate planning.”

Some evidence

✓ Direct answer Janice told us:

  • Squamish needs more shelter and supportive-housing spaces, even if they are located near residential areas.Somewhat disagrees

    “Heart/, Canadian Alliance to End Homelessness (Built for Zero), and Dignity Village concept should be explored for Squamish”

  • The shelter and its services should be moved out of downtown.Strongly disagrees

    “Those individuals need support that they can walk to so it must stay in the downtown. To mitigate impacts on land owners nearby the district may need to look at finding a way to acquire their land so they get a fair shake having been put into a situation where they can no longer sell it.”

  • The District should clear tent from public spaces, even when there is nowhere else for those people to go.Somewhat agrees

    “Yes....the district could begin by putting up washroom, electricity, sani-station and a garbage facility next to the Logger's Sports grounds and in their own municipal park next to Brennan Park. Many of those people would not live in their vehicles if there was affordable housing for them.”

Policing & community safetyAnswered our questionnaire✓ Own answers inside

✓ Direct answer Janice told us:

  • Squamish should fund more RCMP officers and policing.In the middle

    “I am not sure what they do now that gives us a feeling of being safe in our homes. We need a downtown policing location. We need to feel safe in our community.”

Taxes & spendingStrive for zero property tax increases; limit debt; referendums on big projects✓ Own answers inside

Calls for spending discipline, , needs over wants, market value for District land sales, limits on new debt and referendums on major capital projects. Asked by the Chief what she would cut to reach zero, she said she was not sure yet and that an inventory of all spending was needed. [source]

“Annually, we should strive for zero increases in property taxes. Zero based budgeting can get us there.”

Well documented

✓ Direct answer Janice told us:

  • Keeping property tax increases at or below inflation should be a top priority, even if it means cutting services or delaying projects.Somewhat agrees

    “Direct Staff to bring a budget to Council that reflects zero increase over last year. Cut costs, like middle management and wants, we need to do more with less.”

  • The District should sign the proposed 10-year tax agreement with Woodfibre LNG.In the middle

    “Property taxes should never be frozen. Council must retain the ability to determine the per thousand mill rate.”

  • Major recreation investments, like renewing Brennan Park, should go ahead even if the District has to borrow.Strongly agrees

    “We have to have those facilities and must work harder to get government grants and involve the private sector. I would support giving naming rights depending on the contribution.”

Climate & environmentAnswered our questionnaire✓ Own answers inside

✓ Direct answer Janice told us:

  • Climate action should be a top council priority, even when it adds cost.In the middle

    “We need to be climate conscious and require air conditioning units in all new apartments and new builds and water meters as well. The district should always use best practices.”

Woodfibre LNG plantRenegotiate the WLNG tax deal for more money; sees WLNG as the town's only economic engine✓ Own answers inside

Does not support the Woodfibre LNG 10-Year Agreement in Principle, saying more money could be negotiated and a new council should reset the relationship, while describing WLNG as currently Squamish's one and only economic engine that the town has to work with. [source]

“This should be done with a new council who does a reset on the relationship with WLNG.”

Well documented

✓ Direct answer Janice told us:

  • The District should use its permit powers to press Woodfibre LNG on local impacts, even if that means delays or legal fights.In the middle

    “We need to be reasonable.”

Transportation & transitMore downtown parking now; more frequent buses, evening/weekend service and express regional links✓ Own answers inside

Says retail, medical-office and downtown employees need parking options immediately; would explore managing empty stalls in downtown residential buildings and on-street cafe stalls, via a stakeholder parking committee with one councillor. Her transit page calls for more frequent service on core routes, evening and weekend hours, coverage of newer neighbourhoods, better shelters and real-time arrival information, and exploring express regional connections with BC Transit and TransLink. She also wants new developments located and designed to support transit. [source]

“Retail employees, medical offices, and downtown employees all need parking options immediately.”
[quote source]

Well documented

✓ Direct answer Janice told us:

  • Regional transit to Vancouver and Whistler is worth spending local tax dollars on.Strongly agrees

    “The Province increased density on us and needs to come to the table, and the ridership needs to pick up the balance.”

Parking'Nowhere near enough parking spaces downtown'; wants bylaws to require adequate stalls for all housing, and a parking committee to look at angle parking, an employee lot and Loggers Lane✓ Own answers inside

Parking is the first issue on her platform. She says high-density development has pushed residents' second cars onto the street and displaced downtown employees into the two-hour zones. Immediate steps: move restaurant patios off street stalls and ban food trucks from parking on Cleveland and Second between Victoria and Pemberton. She would strike a community Parking Committee to explore angle parking, a dedicated employee lot, angle parking on the old Loggers Lane rail bed and reopening side streets to parking, and task it with 'updating parking bylaws to require adequate stalls for all forms of housing; including suites' and investigating permit parking, pay parking and one-way streets. She also wants the one-stall-per-suite rule enforced. On a parkade: 'Maybe we don't need a parkade; but we do have to investigate all options first.' [source]

“There are nowhere near enough parking spaces downtown. High-density development has pushed residents with two vehicles onto the street, displacing the spots once used by downtown employees.”

Well documented

✓ Direct answer Janice told us:

  • New buildings should have to provide enough parking for the people who live there, instead of being approved with less.Strongly agrees

    “No more parking . Review the bylaw and amend it to Squamish's needs.”

Jobs & local economyAttract industry as an 'economic engine'✓ Own answers inside

Wants to attract industry that provides well-paid jobs and tax revenue, noting the loss of forestry and a living wage ($28/hr) far above minimum wage. Says retail and industrial tax rates are considerably higher than residential and push businesses to close. [source]

“I want to attract industry that will function as an 'economic engine', providing new jobs and attracting new business.”

Well documented

✓ Direct answer Janice told us:

  • The District should cut red tape and speed up permits for builders and businesses.Somewhat agrees

    “There needs to be a process where there are strict timelines to move permits through all the (to many) hoops. Review and cut those requirements where it makes sense (common sense). No more sidewalks to nowhere!”

Compare everyone on: growth and development · housing · homelessness and supportive housing · policing and community safety · property taxes and spending · climate and the environment · the Woodfibre LNG plant · transit and Highway 99 · parking · jobs and the local economy.

Janice’s own priority list
  1. Livability: housing and density, parking, recreation facilities, transit, safety, property taxes
  2. Affordability: help for workers earning below the living wage; attract an 'economic engine'
  3. Fiscal Responsibility: , strive for zero property tax increases, limit debt
  4. Accountability & Transparency: referendums on major capital projects, council taking authority back from staff
  5. A land bank for employee housing and housing society projects

Janice explains their answers ✓ Direct

Janice added a comment to 17 of the statements we put to every candidate. These are Janice’s words, unedited.

  • Squamish is growing too fast. Council should slow the pace of new development approvals.Strongly agrees

    “Existing infrastructure does not meet our needs....roads, sidewalks, transit, hospital, seniors care, schools, need to be in place before we increase our density.”

  • Taller buildings (above 6 storeys) should be allowed downtown and near transit and services.Strongly disagrees

    “People move here for the lifestyle and part of that is view scapes. Let us keep that which remains. Build smaller and lower for awhile.”

  • Squamish should open new land and new neighbourhoods for housing, rather than adding density to existing ones.Strongly agrees

    “Our neighbourhoods were established by the people who lived here. Do not destroy the ambiance and sense of community which is so important.”

  • The District should put more public money and land into non-market and housing.Somewhat disagrees

    “The District should only put land into a project that is a community amenity. Land that is zoned industrial should be saved for an opportunity that will provide permanent jobs. Other municipal land should be used for partnerships that support seniors housing and housing for households making less than the median income.”

Show 13 more
  • Squamish needs more shelter and supportive-housing spaces, even if they are located near residential areas.Somewhat disagrees

    “Heart/, Canadian Alliance to End Homelessness (Built for Zero), and Dignity Village concept should be explored for Squamish”

  • Squamish should fund more RCMP officers and policing.In the middle

    “I am not sure what they do now that gives us a feeling of being safe in our homes. We need a downtown policing location. We need to feel safe in our community.”

  • Keeping property tax increases at or below inflation should be a top priority, even if it means cutting services or delaying projects.Somewhat agrees

    “Direct Staff to bring a budget to Council that reflects zero increase over last year. Cut costs, like middle management and wants, we need to do more with less.”

  • The District should sign the proposed 10-year tax agreement with Woodfibre LNG.In the middle

    “Property taxes should never be frozen. Council must retain the ability to determine the per thousand mill rate.”

  • The District should use its permit powers to press Woodfibre LNG on local impacts, even if that means delays or legal fights.In the middle

    “We need to be reasonable.”

  • Climate action should be a top council priority, even when it adds cost.In the middle

    “We need to be climate conscious and require air conditioning units in all new apartments and new builds and water meters as well. The district should always use best practices.”

  • The District should cut red tape and speed up permits for builders and businesses.Somewhat agrees

    “There needs to be a process where there are strict timelines to move permits through all the (to many) hoops. Review and cut those requirements where it makes sense (common sense). No more sidewalks to nowhere!”

  • Regional transit to Vancouver and Whistler is worth spending local tax dollars on.Strongly agrees

    “The Province increased density on us and needs to come to the table, and the ridership needs to pick up the balance.”

  • New buildings should have to provide enough parking for the people who live there, instead of being approved with less.Strongly agrees

    “No more parking . Review the bylaw and amend it to Squamish's needs.”

  • Major recreation investments, like renewing Brennan Park, should go ahead even if the District has to borrow.Strongly agrees

    “We have to have those facilities and must work harder to get government grants and involve the private sector. I would support giving naming rights depending on the contribution.”

  • The shelter and its services should be moved out of downtown.Strongly disagrees

    “Those individuals need support that they can walk to so it must stay in the downtown. To mitigate impacts on land owners nearby the district may need to look at finding a way to acquire their land so they get a fair shake having been put into a situation where they can no longer sell it.”

  • The District should clear tent from public spaces, even when there is nowhere else for those people to go.Somewhat agrees

    “Yes....the district could begin by putting up washroom, electricity, sani-station and a garbage facility next to the Logger's Sports grounds and in their own municipal park next to Brennan Park. Many of those people would not live in their vehicles if there was affordable housing for them.”

  • Spending on inclusion and community symbols (such as rainbow crosswalks, flags and proclamations) is a good use of District money.In the middle

    “As long as the cost is minimal those symbos add to the sense of community. However, at present we need every penny we have to upgrade our infrastructure so common sense must prevail.”

Janice answered 17 of the 38 statements we put to every candidate. The answers with comments are above. Tap below for the full list.

All 17 of Janice’s questionnaire answers ✓ Direct
  • Squamish is growing too fast. Council should slow the pace of new development approvals.Strongly agrees

    “Existing infrastructure does not meet our needs....roads, sidewalks, transit, hospital, seniors care, schools, need to be in place before we increase our density.”

  • Taller buildings (above 6 storeys) should be allowed downtown and near transit and services.Strongly disagrees

    “People move here for the lifestyle and part of that is view scapes. Let us keep that which remains. Build smaller and lower for awhile.”

  • Squamish should open new land and new neighbourhoods for housing, rather than adding density to existing ones.Strongly agrees

    “Our neighbourhoods were established by the people who lived here. Do not destroy the ambiance and sense of community which is so important.”

  • The District should put more public money and land into non-market and housing.Somewhat disagrees

    “The District should only put land into a project that is a community amenity. Land that is zoned industrial should be saved for an opportunity that will provide permanent jobs. Other municipal land should be used for partnerships that support seniors housing and housing for households making less than the median income.”

  • Squamish needs more shelter and supportive-housing spaces, even if they are located near residential areas.Somewhat disagrees

    “Heart/, Canadian Alliance to End Homelessness (Built for Zero), and Dignity Village concept should be explored for Squamish”

  • Squamish should fund more RCMP officers and policing.In the middle

    “I am not sure what they do now that gives us a feeling of being safe in our homes. We need a downtown policing location. We need to feel safe in our community.”

  • Keeping property tax increases at or below inflation should be a top priority, even if it means cutting services or delaying projects.Somewhat agrees

    “Direct Staff to bring a budget to Council that reflects zero increase over last year. Cut costs, like middle management and wants, we need to do more with less.”

  • The District should sign the proposed 10-year tax agreement with Woodfibre LNG.In the middle

    “Property taxes should never be frozen. Council must retain the ability to determine the per thousand mill rate.”

  • The District should use its permit powers to press Woodfibre LNG on local impacts, even if that means delays or legal fights.In the middle

    “We need to be reasonable.”

  • Climate action should be a top council priority, even when it adds cost.In the middle

    “We need to be climate conscious and require air conditioning units in all new apartments and new builds and water meters as well. The district should always use best practices.”

  • The District should cut red tape and speed up permits for builders and businesses.Somewhat agrees

    “There needs to be a process where there are strict timelines to move permits through all the (to many) hoops. Review and cut those requirements where it makes sense (common sense). No more sidewalks to nowhere!”

  • Regional transit to Vancouver and Whistler is worth spending local tax dollars on.Strongly agrees

    “The Province increased density on us and needs to come to the table, and the ridership needs to pick up the balance.”

  • New buildings should have to provide enough parking for the people who live there, instead of being approved with less.Strongly agrees

    “No more parking . Review the bylaw and amend it to Squamish's needs.”

  • Major recreation investments, like renewing Brennan Park, should go ahead even if the District has to borrow.Strongly agrees

    “We have to have those facilities and must work harder to get government grants and involve the private sector. I would support giving naming rights depending on the contribution.”

  • The shelter and its services should be moved out of downtown.Strongly disagrees

    “Those individuals need support that they can walk to so it must stay in the downtown. To mitigate impacts on land owners nearby the district may need to look at finding a way to acquire their land so they get a fair shake having been put into a situation where they can no longer sell it.”

  • The District should clear tent from public spaces, even when there is nowhere else for those people to go.Somewhat agrees

    “Yes....the district could begin by putting up washroom, electricity, sani-station and a garbage facility next to the Logger's Sports grounds and in their own municipal park next to Brennan Park. Many of those people would not live in their vehicles if there was affordable housing for them.”

  • Spending on inclusion and community symbols (such as rainbow crosswalks, flags and proclamations) is a good use of District money.In the middle

    “As long as the cost is minimal those symbos add to the sense of community. However, at present we need every penny we have to upgrade our infrastructure so common sense must prevail.”

Answered by Janice DesJardins on October 6, 2026. Where these differ from our earlier reading of the public record, the candidate’s own answer is what counts in the quiz and compare pages.

Questions about Janice DesJardins

  • Is Janice DesJardins on Squamish council?

    Yes. Janice DesJardins was elected to Squamish council on October 17, 2026 with 3,688 votes, one of six councillors serving with Mayor Sean Easton until 2030.

  • When does Janice DesJardins take office?

    Janice DesJardins is sworn in with the new council at the inaugural meeting on November 3, 2026 at 6 p.m. at Squamish Valley Golf Club, 2458 Mamquam Road.

  • What did Janice DesJardins promise?

    We track 10 promises Janice made during the 2026 campaign, including: Seek a negotiated settlement and a reset with Woodfibre LNG on taxes, worker housing and amenities; Start considering the Cheema lands and Fast properties for housing on higher ground; Keep the six homes with no parking zoning switched off until frequent buses actually run. Each one is marked kept or not kept by how Janice votes, not by what council as a whole decides.

  • How has Janice DesJardins voted on council?

    Council hasn’t voted yet. The first regular meeting is November 17, 2026. Every vote Janice casts will be listed on this page.

  • How much is a Squamish councillor paid?

    In 2025 the each councillor was paid $46,926, not counting expenses and benefits, according to the District of Squamish financial statement.

About Janice

Long-time Squamish resident and volunteer whose family roots in town date to 1912; her grandfather Alex Munro founded the volunteer fire department and was its first chief. Seniors and long-term-care advocate: Vice Chair of the Vancouver Coastal Association of Family Councils, Co-Chair of the VCH Regional Resident & Family Councils, member of the Independent Long Term Care Councils Association of BC and the Seniors Aging at Home Community Network. Previously sat on the District's first tourism plan committee and with the Squamish Estuary Conservation Society on the Estuary Management Plan.

Where Janice leans on money, growth and LNG
Homelessnessin the middle
◀ More shelters, even near homes · let camps stayMove shelters out of downtown · clear camps ▶
Moneyleans “invest in services”
◀ Invest in servicesHold taxes down ▶
Growthleans “slow down, be cautious”
◀ Slow down, be cautiousBuild more, faster ▶
The Woodfibre tax dealin the middle
◀ Reject or renegotiate itSign it ▶
Climate & environmentin the middle
◀ Keep costs downClimate first ▶

Worked out from Janice’s public statements and votes, not a label they chose. See everyone side by side · Who on council thinks like you? Take the quiz.

Sources we used (12)

Are you Janice DesJardins, or did you spot a mistake? Email squamishvoters@gmail.com to update or add to this page. How corrections work.