← All candidates

Running for mayor of Squamish

3 people are running for mayor in the October 17, 2026 election: Daniel Deal, Sean Easton, Jenna Stoner. You vote for one. Here they are side by side, in alphabetical order.

Daniel Deal

34-year-old who grew up in Courtice, Ontario and works as an information systems analyst in the carbon capture industry; previous jobs include labourer, rebar rodman, crane operator apprentice, facility manager and environmental remediation operator, including time on Fort McMurray oil sands projects. The Squamish Chief reports he has a construction management degree. He says he chose to move to Squamish and at one point lived out of a small car between rentals; his site does not say what year he arrived.

A Better Deal for Squamish

Supports, among other things:

Daniel’s full profile →

Sean Easton

Co-Executive Director of Zero Ceiling, a Whistler-based non-profit working to end youth homelessness (he took on leadership in 2017), and co-founder of DWIFT Housing Society, a Squamish non-profit aiming to sell homes at cost. He arrived in Squamish in 2011 as a whitewater rafting guide, later trained as a youth worker, co-built the multi-generational 'Heart House' with family, and recently launched the engagement collective Residents United.

A Squamish You Can Afford

Supports, among other things:

Sean’s full profile →

Jenna Stoner

Current councillor. Two-term councillor (elected 2018, re-elected 2022). Outside council she has about 15 years' experience in sustainable fisheries and aquaculture at the intersection of business, government and environmental conservation (in 2022 she worked for Sustainable Fisheries Partnership); holds a Master of Marine Management (Dalhousie) and a BSc (UVic). Born in Squamish and raised in the Sea to Sky corridor, she moved back in 2014 and is raising two children here; a former Squamish Climate Action Network board member (2016-2018).

Squamish is evolving. Let's shape what comes next, together.

Supports, among other things:

Jenna’s full profile →

Issue by issue

🏗️ Growth & development

🏠 Housing affordability

🤝 Homelessness & supportive housing

🚓 Policing & community safety

💵 Taxes & spending

🌲 Climate, environment & the LNG plant

🚌 Transportation & transit

🅿️ Parking

💼 Jobs & local economy

Agree or disagree?

StatementDaniel DealSean EastonJenna Stoner
Squamish is growing too fast. Council should slow the pace of new development approvals.Strongly disagreesStrongly agreesSomewhat disagrees
Taller buildings (above 6 storeys) should be allowed downtown and near transit and services.Somewhat disagreesIn the middleSomewhat disagrees
Squamish should open new land and new neighbourhoods for housing, rather than adding density to existing ones.In the middleSomewhat disagreesSomewhat disagrees
The District should put more public money and land into non-market and below-market housing.Strongly agreesStrongly agreesStrongly agrees
Squamish needs more shelter and supportive-housing spaces, even if they are located near residential areas.In the middleSomewhat agreesStrongly agrees
Squamish should fund more RCMP officers and policing.Somewhat disagreesIn the middleSomewhat agrees
Keeping property tax increases at or below inflation should be a top priority, even if it means cutting services or delaying projects.Strongly agreesStrongly agreesSomewhat disagrees
The District should sign the proposed 10-year tax agreement with Woodfibre LNG.Strongly disagreesStrongly disagreesStrongly disagrees
The District should use its permit powers to press Woodfibre LNG on local impacts, even if that means delays or legal fights.Somewhat disagreesSomewhat agreesSomewhat agrees
Climate action should be a top council priority, even when it adds cost.No position foundSomewhat agreesStrongly agrees
The District should cut red tape and speed up permits for builders and businesses.Strongly agreesStrongly agreesIn the middle
Regional transit to Vancouver and Whistler is worth spending local tax dollars on.In the middleSomewhat agreesStrongly agrees
New buildings should have to provide enough parking for the people who live there, instead of being approved with less.Strongly agreesStrongly agreesSomewhat disagrees
Major recreation investments, like renewing Brennan Park, should go ahead even if the District has to borrow.Somewhat disagreesSomewhat agreesStrongly agrees
The Under One Roof shelter and its services should be moved out of downtown.No position foundIn the middleStrongly disagrees
The District should clear tent encampments from public spaces, even when there is nowhere else for those people to go.Strongly disagreesStrongly disagreesStrongly disagrees
Spending on inclusion and community symbols — such as rainbow crosswalks, flags and proclamations — is a good use of District money.Somewhat agreesIn the middleStrongly agrees